Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp777533pxb; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:45:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzv0eianV7SnbYUH6YG7LengDbCbHIpHJ4XmUvW6qMrrtv+wIlTgYbAxwOxQdS7rRisB5+U X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1142:b0:44d:d43a:ac5d with SMTP id b2-20020a056a00114200b0044dd43aac5dmr21825115pfm.30.1635212758465; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:45:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635212758; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=B1p6jWMn8guLU6iEx1qLKyN35iywPbyfUas0bUCN05b0oH6dAvJG++48yvmmPlajwT fehHs6T0Wjf83qBQuOa9ewPLC8HpFgfSXhK4yK2n9Qz+iFHrO9F9V20WOHuQLIYU6e4M qO2Q/Uq720CdjMZMGEkvVkjgOkfgqPykpyEp6mxebFimQNM7m5eTPqGbtGy3pxZdQK+Q WaLDG643Iv2ygdwOpMHMSM28osWcyxBD2Df+m/S3fIIkYdncK42xicpYLh2Z+If/MLHb Z26DanIdPBtJEX4qcYBAShKcHtO+Uf9SQvEgLY+Q8stHO9CPhF69fgl7m+FJDLkhZOwD WrBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=UIAILnvmh2/9j33N6oAfYSNJRTmxRzsLhCUoA4trZck=; b=QONR8vTjESOsVkiYKnQNpg8O7WZsUljQWchkCgi5lEtuWC2Yo6TkLZsYPOmwGL2y+s tug/8/wqegZ9c6+Qf6bVZ6kKtrM2CVQKoKrPYp7kUByIhtxIIIHWuQgADX0HHd53Ftmm MWyyyqJ9eAjI4iXjLpZtfE+bTuxPICgZlNzbRB0RGOHX4hvzZwucw0xMoUgm3fj8Urbt xN96fUslAVBIgo0mD3HXDIkH2TjyyR+omLo+O5kcV65VQldTxUkkXsoNC6lVnEcDW6uT CHfQR8hHKzzxw6wpNm2oaaxZyiD5jpjPPc+LOumiK7YYNXB3SUSo5CpkPmiMHx97L3+P IlQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bawaqQcX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p12si24431938plk.123.2021.10.25.18.45.45; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bawaqQcX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233638AbhJYVbz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:31:55 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:30559 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233650AbhJYVbw (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:31:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635197369; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UIAILnvmh2/9j33N6oAfYSNJRTmxRzsLhCUoA4trZck=; b=bawaqQcXyOmee01AU3+g0l2vVGB8ev1pBzv70N/t8dMxyxfdEC9WquK+7htWgmDl9hyumd 4tCqBbde8ZwryIhPweFrOwj7HlZLQKR2GAVizNq+F0e+xaKQGdMaMGhIUyhFwWuNxT1yZb 9nCWy29xqmi8ptFrBbvu6iLJQi3pyns= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-33-OJlpAbD5PLuyCLfnSe9Wrg-1; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:29:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OJlpAbD5PLuyCLfnSe9Wrg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id k28-20020a508adc000000b003dd5e21da4bso3515234edk.11 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIAILnvmh2/9j33N6oAfYSNJRTmxRzsLhCUoA4trZck=; b=5o8yEvIz9MudrPQdKN45e/+Nc/qyBEFNUPlaC/3H8B626wmPNrF0hxjfFFpE6l3x0z mDqcKyM7J5n3v96mJFljUv9umpAHCtBAEp5v0sxzal/8U+xNkm7YQ6wCgHz5cmSUbcDF LVkIN7RvtVNFwhFGw4C8/kya3lkEkCrIedT12X3ETYWRw2cyspgCHKtaRstselfvr7qA lrp6DIcYOwYM65M/K35QN9o1nfiT5ZfRGlqAX1mdECWZboOKYnQJ6zaixjIWBOW65r9I wuaUtooZDyFH602d5gfrWelsXRYgN+uZc2a6lzfBtZDLZmDcfL634YO1Aqf1VkaBXHle +c/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oe9PQ1SW4qpvaNqSsT0jrbXn7BtXWwByhk6/I83zzVXesEcJl SjSLk1t5rXAcJzeMWi3jKB3biz7VrZFnAOnHsjFReIa7nJiKNTppQlrd7K5CG4pQuZPqZY5OTNf cmOZPpKw4Ah6ZGAFWpVBuXP8I X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d597:: with SMTP id r23mr20892319edq.173.1635197366527; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d597:: with SMTP id r23mr20892299edq.173.1635197366371; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214? (2001-1c00-0c1e-bf00-1054-9d19-e0f0-8214.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm9733063edk.62.2021.10.25.14.29.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92c26aee-d3eb-258c-a0dd-e09783db6a20@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 23:29:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c) Content-Language: en-US To: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Mario Limonciello Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Shyam Sundar S K References: <20211025204921.73cb3011@canb.auug.org.au> From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 10/25/21 22:50, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/25/21 2:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> There seems to be something amiss with cnosole output in today's release >> (at least on my ppc qemu boot tests). >> >> Changes since 20211022: >> > > on x86_64: > > ../drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c: In function ‘amd_pmc_verify_czn_rtc’: > ../drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c:428:30: error: ‘CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC_DEVICE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE’? >   rtc_device = rtc_class_open(CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC_DEVICE); >                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >                               CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE Hmm, yes using either CONFIG setting is a problem since it is not always defined. Both simply default to "rtc0" though and this is also which standard distro configs use. Mario, can we just replace CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC_DEVICE with "rtc0" here to fix this ? Regards, Hans