Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932888AbXABSZ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:25:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932730AbXABSZ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:25:58 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:9781 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932888AbXABSZ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:25:57 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,227,1165219200"; d="scan'208"; a="180705329:sNHT30064678" From: "Chen, Kenneth W" To: "'Zach Brown'" , "Christoph Hellwig" Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "linux-kernel" Subject: RE: [patch] remove redundant iov segment check Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:25:55 -0800 Message-ID: <000601c72e9b$717f86a0$ff0da8c0@amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AccumupxbKgKfzvEQL++xYbhofQWNwAABODA In-Reply-To: <712B05B5-F7E2-4F19-9980-2CA95C5D15AC@oracle.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 787 Lines: 22 Zach Brown wrote on Tuesday, January 02, 2007 10:22 AM > >> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to make this change as part of a > >> larger change that moves towards an explicit iovec container struct > >> rather than bare 'struct iov *' and 'nr_segs' arguments. > > > I suspect it should be rather trivial to get this started. As a first > > step we simply add a > > > > struct iodesc { > > int nr_segs; > > struct iovec ioc[] > > }; > > Agreed, does anyone plan to try this in the near future? Yes, I will take a stab at it this week. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/