Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:03:01 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/vmalloc: add support for __GFP_NOFAIL
Message-ID: <YXeoJbzICpNsEEBr@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20211025150223.13621-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <20211025150223.13621-3-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <163520277623.16092.15759069160856953654@noble.neil.brown.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <163520277623.16092.15759069160856953654@noble.neil.brown.name>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue 26-10-21 09:59:36, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -3032,6 +3036,10 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
> >  		warn_alloc(gfp_mask, NULL,
> >  			"vmalloc error: size %lu, vm_struct allocation failed",
> >  			real_size);
> > +		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
> > +			schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> > +			goto again;
> > +		}
> 
> Shouldn't the retry happen *before* the warning?

I've done it after to catch the "depleted or fragmented" vmalloc space.
This is not related to the memory available and therefore it won't be
handled by the oom killer. The error message shouldn't imply the vmalloc
allocation failure IMHO but I am open to suggestions.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs