Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1187083pxb; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:35:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdGGhyevaWT6QBMkQGuCgG07ibc95+HzYP1k76NJjgsf6XMi2Zd+ZSizLR0As9gh2GbJ4q X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ca18:: with SMTP id jt24mr29546891ejb.325.1635248153994; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:35:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635248153; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MVnFViyLpnRXH9pqbFqKKNmOyHwbuMsdZr3105IayThjgrtfqMlvYLjTzBNBI+J//j dGrQSKpyhjbbdYsnCC6+C9MYm+pBoujgen6kVDaqOkNK/EQ0HelY4HWRzc0CfezqGmEh n/cvmdJP4QCbp0I05bEmtO6Kx7XoDjN1MGtQmrKcpnLAFg9qN66pknNqTbt2MuzrCSqm EwhM66CTB/UN+ONcBrE3NGCCcz4+6DhEXm0LiLHtqkoYvNSw4up40ko3dhalBkwe3Hx6 by6mbbxbZCTRyHDMgralfeJqBG3Dd48e4WDbr8gP1lj156lOhAf7erDDhyoZvByH72f4 fUGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=ZlF9fY6PsyziFEKG3nAl7dSY/8J3pdkpFGZOy2diHZI=; b=BtV6fjlCi9dSETDWT+OgQEHLIsr/X3xac6nhrSySHxzJ3sUPsMf96JZ5Aa5KTvpHGi JEK7OZGDvNfgB5Mc7TWNOy9YkpbzeluyupQVIRCyzhrJDyB46Pe/yuSw0rzzu+HAysME g5r6DPH1M0/J7pyaGPe0WMKj43wi9/prkgbOqJOBvuitRn20d1pTpLHmNolZpB2Sj7WD zxpBKHeRvyljAr9R/owWtDFSBRYwmdur/IE/rEOtdAxhTq/EAewdZOgNq8PZz1FEK0GL QHh00tQQd3D23Kq1zia381k4S0YAQyl4/VMtxx2zM39zs4h+0CFMqXr0Iehy9B3hnrow F6VQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sd38si24037379ejc.293.2021.10.26.04.35.09; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234759AbhJZJ1t (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 05:27:49 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:55346 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234769AbhJZJ1o (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 05:27:44 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9B01063; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84FFE3F70D; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:25:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, catalin.marinas@arm.com, deanbo422@gmail.com, green.hu@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org, jonas@southpole.se, kernelfans@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, nickhu@andestech.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, shorne@gmail.com, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, tglx@linutronix.de, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, vgupta@kernel.org, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, will@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 02/17] irq: mips: simplify bcm6345_l1_irq_handle() Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:24:49 +0100 Message-Id: <20211026092504.27071-3-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20211026092504.27071-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20211026092504.27071-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As bcm6345_l1_irq_handle() only needs to know /whether/ an IRQ was resolved, and doesn't need to know the specific IRQ, it's simpler for it to call generic_handle_domain_irq() directly and check the return code, so let's do that. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Thomas Gleixner --- drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c index 1bd0621c4ce2..fd079215c17f 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c @@ -132,16 +132,12 @@ static void bcm6345_l1_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc) int base = idx * IRQS_PER_WORD; unsigned long pending; irq_hw_number_t hwirq; - unsigned int irq; pending = __raw_readl(cpu->map_base + reg_status(intc, idx)); pending &= __raw_readl(cpu->map_base + reg_enable(intc, idx)); for_each_set_bit(hwirq, &pending, IRQS_PER_WORD) { - irq = irq_linear_revmap(intc->domain, base + hwirq); - if (irq) - generic_handle_irq(irq); - else + if (generic_handle_domain_irq(intc->domain, base + hwirq)) spurious_interrupt(); } } -- 2.11.0