Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: fix fclose/pclose mismatch
To:     Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20211026143409.42666-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com>
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <ce41c5da-2952-e800-54be-51cbcc7a0ada@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:47:26 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211026143409.42666-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/26/21 8:34 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Make sure to use pclose() to properly close the pipe opened by popen().
> 
> Fixes: 81f77fd0deeb ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index cc1cd240445d..e3fea6f281e4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size)
>   
>   	if (getline(&line, &len, fp) == -1)
>   		goto err;
> -	fclose(fp);
> +	pclose(fp);
>   
>   	if (len > size)
>   		len = size;
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size)
>   	free(line);
>   	return 0;
>   err:
> -	fclose(fp);
> +	pclose(fp);
>   	return -1;
>   }
>   
> 

Thank you for the patch. The return logic could be simpler
doing out handling common for error and success path with
just one call to close. Not related to this change though.

Adding bpf maintainers to the thread

Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah