Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:45:19 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic
Message-ID: <YXhMv6rENfn/zsaj@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20211026120132.613201817@infradead.org>
 <CAADnVQJaiHWWnVcaRN43DcNgqktgKs3i1P3uz4Qm8kN7bvPCCg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJaiHWWnVcaRN43DcNgqktgKs3i1P3uz4Qm8kN7bvPCCg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:

> It's a merge conflict. The patchset failed to apply to both bpf and
> bpf-next trees:

Figures :/ I suspect it relies on tip/objtool/core at the very least and
possibly some of the x86 trees as well.

I can locally merge tip/master with bpf, but getting a CI to do that
might be tricky.