Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org
From:   =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling
Message-ID: <df8e9b3e-504c-635d-4e92-99cdf9f05479@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:32:41 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using smp_processor_id()
with preemption enabled, all the checking on CPU could be wrong after preemption.

As Peter point out, the section between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock()
pair require the preemption to be disabled as 'Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst'
explained, but currently the work is done outside of the helpers.

And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion()
and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption to be disabled, we
can just merge the logical together.

Patch 1/2 will make sure preemption disabled when recursion lock succeed,
patch 2/2 will do smp_processor_id() checking after trylock() to address the
issue.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b1d7fe43-ce84-0ed7-32f7-ea1d12d0b716@linux.alibaba.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/
V4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/32a36348-69ee-6464-390c-3a8d6e9d2b53@linux.alibaba.com/
V5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3ca92dc9-ea04-ddc2-71cd-524bfa5a5721@linux.alibaba.com/

Michael Wang (2):
  ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked
  ftrace: do CPU checking after preemption disabled

 arch/csky/kernel/probes/ftrace.c     |  2 --
 arch/parisc/kernel/ftrace.c          |  2 --
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |  2 --
 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/ftrace.c    |  2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c     |  2 --
 include/linux/trace_recursion.h      | 13 ++++++++++++-
 kernel/livepatch/patch.c             | 13 +++++++------
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c                | 15 +++++----------
 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c      |  6 +++---
 kernel/trace/trace_functions.c       |  5 -----
 10 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1