Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm: have kswapd only reclaiming use min protection on memcg
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:01:50 +0800
Message-Id: <1635318110-1905-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>

For the kswapd only reclaiming, there is no chance to try again on
this group while direct reclaim has. fix it by judging gfp flag.

Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 74296c2..41f5776 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2704,7 +2704,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
 			unsigned long protection;
 
 			/* memory.low scaling, make sure we retry before OOM */
-			if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim && low > min) {
+			if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim && low > min
+				&& sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) {
 				protection = low;
 				sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
 			} else {
-- 
1.9.1