Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754280AbXACEia (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:38:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754244AbXACEia (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:38:30 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42929 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754180AbXACEi3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:38:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:38:28 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070102.203828.70220767.davem@davemloft.net> To: jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@laptop.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, wmb@firmworks.com, jg@laptop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20070102.140749.104035927.davem@davemloft.net> <3676953abedcbe6d86da74a4997593cb@kernel.crashing.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1640 Lines: 37 From: Jan Engelhardt Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 02:13:39 +0100 (MET) > > On Jan 3 2007 01:52, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> > Leaving aside the issue of in-memory or not, I don't think > >> > it is realistic to think any completely common implementation > >> > will work for this -- it might for current SPARC+PowerPC+OLPC, > >> > but more stuff will be added over time... > >> > >> I see nothing supporting this IMHO bogus claim. > > > > Please keep in mind that not all systems want to kill OF > > as soon as they enter the kernel -- some want to keep it > > active basically forever (or only remove it when the user > > asks for it). > > Kill OF? sparc does not want that IMO, how else should I return to > the 'ok' prompt? PowerPC kills OF because it really has to, that's one of numerous reasons that it started sucking the device tree into a kernel copy early in the bootup and using that for device discovery etc. To be honest, the 'ok' prompt is of limited value when you have things like Alt-SysRq and PPC's XMON debugger in the kernel already. In fact, the 'ok' prompt is an ENORMOUS pain in the ass to support on machines with USB keyboards, because sharing the USB host controller is beyond non-trivial. I've never implemented support for that on sparc64 and I frankly have no desire to do the work necessary to support that. It simply is not worth it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/