Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp886671pxb; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxf7Xk+Vv407oik/YGTnJ25X256fkyPT3ga/LIuFSJn0ExZl066R6lpy5YwnH0uvoyrNUF X-Received: by 2002:a50:cc49:: with SMTP id n9mr443322edi.273.1635370154072; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635370154; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HeSljg+fikZwSAq1goNwn62ZMePtToyfT6HKj/w4LCndd/VFM+iXwX80SpKjdPa147 a29t2Kxn9Ap4kU6P3OHwa9MUYBku394ZChpXseN4L5A9eP/CV7p7U7cMnCyaKF2fWRaz CpgQ2OfmCbtMirsFjUgQ8ySoHtWqfJi3yeSCaAwc8AlcTanW/SgGBzzH4UX7kRZLlCdR cfE+Bm+7U1NN8u+kShi1uNdi7AR/EJAfauT3jeDjGxz2XcGKpDb1M/qYMTXagdOqatPL 1y/DJ4jXrrvJU3cJVQ89aT1txKtENWZn5ZXiubWcIDW+3G+3NkK6vb6HQDqj8UYtX74m eVXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=8HVWDdXXt0AD/xSFizk+AYjOVZmIDbS9XwzvKXYRSt8=; b=qcT2B9t/ADktIywCy+xbb7fRoSPKBUj5/PIFuAt6ltB6HOiDUT4yKJRq9HgDYKF8/e phea/JC1HbY2zLsFCtH6CiiIil4fNFfAarxXrMtAww8QZ3iDWaVToImLTuHGOaqoWwJO hR41hI8nDan2oHKP7iMkjZW76oaVz5pl52owJnbkhunEjfweJTrSXo9gg1/IonIpRwn/ AruUDjRIdv0ZDwBtx8LPlaTgIJLL4hCDRW9y8ofKOVGx2Gn1m7fnBQV5IpsY5CkzlHH8 dOLj60qP6EG0qRCtZ2lLBTPVp6tLzv0ZMipqVmnhALPuxr2yeqLkcII1BqjK6pejA520 0KjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=OEfG9fsg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b10si1690178edd.241.2021.10.27.14.28.50; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=OEfG9fsg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242776AbhJ0PdG (ORCPT + 97 others); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:33:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242770AbhJ0PdF (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:33:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF20EC061745 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id t184so3114363pfd.0 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8HVWDdXXt0AD/xSFizk+AYjOVZmIDbS9XwzvKXYRSt8=; b=OEfG9fsgSPXFsuD00eYA/4hb/4nOJhqt3Fa3DsCVNZsfitbSN/e7Fn81m4qSyNF6U/ mhh/R9TUBiF7pjmngLNdEADzgfxtm/aVHY0H9J+z6ozxZ49ZZu8j36ZA8vNS+jc3P4K8 39l9ZJZa9RV8xzTd4Pq6XBto9wKnNJruu9xTNPgxAnhf+lq+LyLyNX9Nl8mvXteW2N67 +TcMWmCTLvtk136TTAc8/TraiE87+QKjoC7eTJ2OAuWqRKMp2hqkYHzHc/UrtgHJUjNB S90jgPj6NxctTlEeFg16F+/ojMD4VkEXJciV+yM/BHrhD9Juzesc0Jpe/IsL5krJCSuw Hz+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8HVWDdXXt0AD/xSFizk+AYjOVZmIDbS9XwzvKXYRSt8=; b=7cH1xJtRnx2UfgvESJIv8+wfUj6L7YGUuAn2j6axcuh6hWrAgfBpIqXFNBwGbwXurx po6DWWVdR+Uzinb9OdkS331LDxDS0pjh9ds1LtZZ8zuaXnck+XWoJbtGOA+HnI9VuvHq SzNau6vE7vkvOh5vkX59yP7B/qWuuVEEtPqV6WciEwNnRZWGYKEqAnej0LN9SWd7hKV0 EhcG44BDbgtwNIOivyokGhD7nctyklMW2n5ZM/kgoOs7WqgHP9utxpB1grILYYkl2+3b byVYoN/tQjAVexsOYQ6KT9L4VoH68QKS2zeS45XRwM5GPlzLeAWr5j5q85o7yzbH+6cH 3C9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J92rVrG6Re+fib4qyGUk7CW0RhTPVvk3WC6NEcxULKrVtAiCL uStNSS903IdDxn5hHVJbQTvEvg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:698a:: with SMTP id e132mr24303698pgc.434.1635348638933; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm180048pge.48.2021.10.27.08.30.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:30:34 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU Message-ID: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > doesn't it? Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere.