Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:56:19 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as
 encrypted
Message-ID: <YXmEo8iMNIn1esYC@zn.tnic>
References: <8afff0c64feb6b96db36112cb865243f4ae280ca.1634922135.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <c997e8a2-b364-2a8e-d247-438e9d937a1e@amd.com>
 <CAMj1kXGH7aGR==o1L2dnA9U9L==gM0__10UGznnyZwkHrT84sw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGH7aGR==o1L2dnA9U9L==gM0__10UGznnyZwkHrT84sw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:14:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> I could take it, but since it will ultimately go through -tip anyway,
> perhaps better if they just take it directly? (This will change after
> the next -rc1 though)
> 
> Boris?

Yeah, I'm being told this is not urgent enough to rush in now so you
could queue it into your fixes branch for 5.16 once -rc1 is out and send
it to Linus then. The stable tag is just so it gets backported to the
respective trees.

But if you prefer I should take it, then I can queue it after -rc1.
It'll boil down to the same thing though.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette