Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <3ad75583-b37e-8700-d062-42426966d912@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:27:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Honor certain device identification
 rules
Content-Language: en-US
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
References: <11860508.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <11860508.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 10/26/21 20:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> There are some rules in the ACPI spec regarding which device identification
> objects can be used together etc., but they are not followed by the kernel
> code.
> 
> This series modifies the code to follow the spec more closely (see patch
> changelogs for details).

Both changes seem sensible to me; and since you make _HID take precedence
over _ADR I don't expect this to cause any regressions on BYT / CHT
hardware (the other way around will likely be an issue).

So for the series:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans