Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp889294pxb; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:32:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoTm2vlr60sf5VM5FzxC53Pnf/OauuExrJntB77is8LSBzBrTj0qXla2vjcAOCRx33vGCW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a94:b0:44c:ecb2:6018 with SMTP id b20-20020a056a000a9400b0044cecb26018mr252880pfl.57.1635370235250; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:30:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635370235; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zyn9Ynjt+KpaHdN2A+NboC8M6No1kXMjo7NwvsuW7IhAKsmqIYk4TMKoCyMjI+sTxs oRIuH30S3BaEXTNLcHxBxwU/G+MCZC4z01lJfMOK2mHL5L+QAZnaE09UUjNXmHGbVrol zJJ08ghofKR3nhkLdLUkzUFrua8CPkZt9f5Kr/qnNQh/IU42BdVB8j8BIEoP9dO8hFob hFsF9axleMnv39INoii20deN2+SnPp6lPkwR3KJEvsedpoD8MEz5AAvrTTtvYfGijvhz gAY+4Dk3BnHoHGDhmVjy1SlqbLCESpLoshvXCJCDwuWEm7FKQrSfasRwIxPwhmId0HoE xjpg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=zW16zJv04yfDUVWDufBxfCDpiEkffOTRJHQoBdKu+Tc=; b=guqIf5sjUoPKGeijYG3D9E0mTqYVQaeQe+mbmasZ+mD0AjOtjjFEE/w/Da6zLltZaL l74qL0hRpe0Hyb7FntaHXghddvD9HVIJFD99IonDjOgigGKFIDwVwIuVPcBev0ljUD4z cw+/fqN+iZLEFEGkvQjbEbwcri7rmsOtSKKiCbI9pPMeSOtqrfMoQ7g+Ka2O/M9Qp3U0 pWifb6KTR8VOAUndXT96IM6WQkHvmBOMFge4HLeXq5DHqfqSip6pihoKh7/R7eT9FB5t zO1sZmPdeVhfWOGcoudwCmqHv5dCLJVujBOzBd2uTwcbiClrt+TT3nLEU0C9eBaWtvg5 Q6fQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x3si1346761pgr.434.2021.10.27.14.30.18; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243014AbhJ0Qw2 (ORCPT + 97 others); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:52:28 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:45370 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243009AbhJ0Qw1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:52:27 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF94ED1; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.31] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.31]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 786063F70D; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/23] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly To: Reinette Chatre , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Fenghua Yu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, Jamie Iles , D Scott Phillips OS , lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com References: <20211001160302.31189-1-james.morse@arm.com> <20211001160302.31189-14-james.morse@arm.com> <777770fa-c2fb-f091-13f8-a204869d8ab5@intel.com> From: James Morse Message-ID: <6ab52eb2-4f21-e018-0c9d-0ab35c12658d@arm.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:49:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <777770fa-c2fb-f091-13f8-a204869d8ab5@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Reinette, On 15/10/2021 23:28, Reinette Chatre wrote: > On 10/1/2021 9:02 AM, James Morse wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c >> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c >> index 9f45207a6c74..25baacd331e0 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c >> @@ -282,6 +282,27 @@ static bool apply_config(struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom, >>       return false; >>   } >>   +int resctrl_arch_update_one(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d, >> +                u32 closid, enum resctrl_conf_type t, u32 cfg_val) >> +{ >> +    struct rdt_hw_domain *hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_dom(d); >> +    u32 idx = get_config_index(closid, t); >> +    struct msr_param msr_param; >> + >> +    if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &d->cpu_mask)) >> +        return -EINVAL; >> + >> +    hw_dom->ctrl_val[idx] = cfg_val; >> + >> +    msr_param.res = r; >> +    msr_param.low = idx; >> +    msr_param.high = idx + 1; >> + >> +    rdt_ctrl_update(&msr_param); >> + > > rdt_ctrl_update() will take its parameters and recompute the domain that is already > available here ... seems to take a few steps back and then do the needed. Could msr_update > be called directly here instead? Even better! Thanks, James