Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <83c63ace-3277-cf8a-8fd1-88d8d28113db@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:07:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390x: add debug statement for diag 318 CPNC data
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
References: <20211027025451.290124-1-walling@linux.ibm.com>
 <5f91eed7-993a-cb76-8a9f-0c17438cd064@de.ibm.com>
From:   Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <5f91eed7-993a-cb76-8a9f-0c17438cd064@de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/27/21 01:41, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 27.10.21 um 04:54 schrieb Collin Walling:
>> The diag 318 data contains values that denote information regarding the
>> guest's environment. Currently, it is unecessarily difficult to observe
>> this value (either manually-inserted debug statements, gdb stepping, mem
>> dumping etc). It's useful to observe this information to obtain an
>> at-a-glance view of the guest's environment, so lets add a simple VCPU
>> event that prints the CPNC to the s390dbf logs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> applied and queued
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index 6a6dd5e1daf6..da3ff24eabd0 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -4254,6 +4254,7 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>       if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_DIAG318) {
>>           vcpu->arch.diag318_info.val = kvm_run->s.regs.diag318;
>>           vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpnc = vcpu->arch.diag318_info.cpnc;
>> +        VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 2, "setting cpnc to %d",
>> vcpu->arch.diag318_info.cpnc);
> 
> After comparing this with the other events I think level==3 is better.
> Changed when applying.
>>       }
>>       /*
>>        * If userspace sets the riccb (e.g. after migration) to a valid
>> state,
>>

Thanks!


-- 
Regards,
Collin

Stay safe and stay healthy