Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753545AbXACJgN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 04:36:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754471AbXACJgN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 04:36:13 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:50971 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545AbXACJgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 04:36:12 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1521 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:36:12 EST Message-ID: <459B731A.301@web.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:10:50 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, saw@saw.sw.com.sg, Auke Kok Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal References: <20070102215726.GC20714@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070102215726.GC20714@stusta.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 775 Lines: 20 Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch contains the scheduled removal of the eepro100 driver. > I'm sorry to disturb the schedule, but I'm not sure right now if this pending issue of the e100 was meanwhile solved or declared a non-issue: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/8/105 Auke, can you confirm that it makes sense to re-test? IIRC, our private thread ended without resolution after I discovered that the chip revision makes the difference for me. Looked like it is either handled incorrectly by e100 or screwed up on that board. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/