Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750710AbXACKqi (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:46:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750712AbXACKqi (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:46:38 -0500 Received: from poczta.o2.pl ([193.17.41.142]:48955 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbXACKqh (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:46:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:48:14 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Sid Boyce Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, g3vbv@blueyonder.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19 and up to 2.6.20-rc2 Ethernet problems x86_64 Message-ID: <20070103104814.GA2629@ff.dom.local> References: <20061229063254.GA1628@ff.dom.local> <4595CD1B.2020102@blueyonder.co.uk> <20070102115050.GA3449@ff.dom.local> <459A7AF1.5060702@blueyonder.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <459A7AF1.5060702@blueyonder.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1700 Lines: 37 On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:32:01PM +0000, Sid Boyce wrote: > Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > >If you could send full ifconfig, route -n (or ip route > >if you use additional tables) and tcpdump (all packets) > >from both boxes while pinging each other and a few words > >how it is connected (other cards, other active boxes in > >the network?) maybe something more could be found. ... > Everything is fine with a eepro100 on the 64x2 box that gave the same > problem with a nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a1) > using the forcedeth module. On the x86_64 laptop the problem is with a > Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5788 using the tg3 module. Switching back to a > 2.6.18.2 kernel, there is no problem. > With all configurations of cards on both, route -n is the same on all > kernels and instantly reports back. With >=2.6.19 on the laptop, netstat > -r takes a very long time before returning the information ~30 seconds, > instantly on 2.6.18.2. This could be a problem with DNS. Could you do all tests (including pinging) with -n option? I've read your other message on netdev and see you have firewall working and addresses from various networks in logs. I think it would be much easier to exclude possible network config errors and try to isolate pinging problems by connecting (with switch or even crossed cable if possible) only 2 boxes with firewalls and other net devices disabled and try to repeat this pinging with tcpdumps. Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/