Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1162741pxb; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwehMgiQeUYqBxwK68Gh8xxGOquMR7GO8fkf9ZTxOx+v7VUsfr++jnvn9inXBin7Z3wIb9V X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:72d0:: with SMTP id du16mr2254115ejc.226.1635394054448; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:07:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635394054; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ur0B9BM6zC5mWnlMbXI7IGUJsHG1xldAHTYwa1IQSzc056NSx2w2lH5ETCMVypM3kp xZNlzVAy90FWAMl3fnWf80xAYzXh1BeaADG/rPVCJ5ToXmQ36EJFBzv7PYhstVh86OHa sXwBEKQI5xvqtD+iVE/AhJeLCi6NsmtgZhUxgm8opbWSEqYD/LJZEQwcVbdT6SycgP8z oicSLL7qLP+SthEQ4INtM91SAPYFxM06F3+OUMDaexhF/xNxBgNL7bVi/fyYPCA82BEg JISvZwIZzCqeGHMgA7OqioUh/eQBm6Nr/7Ji1kbb2FGl3FlLzM2PKKbBcieKzpwzvd3I eMsQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=y+oA9Wi3ususzBBnEEg1Avch2Xz1EQNeH1IuoQbbiLk=; b=Vidz5I/UUXliFMhSvIXZunZqYyXtqggTwEUWKTDbTeZf/aOoLRjTh/ftbij58pQoOp J/U0Q22xmvyZbKAUaIRZtO968+bUN+6M4cU45RU+pBk9T7tQ3J1F53p/3bnb2lZOdSiM rl7uv5W0O6hYwDJlTaGBdhi3/hdpNtfZDNHHynPimA55XAAUBLZNrxopFFmpWbMrMlo3 jhA6KncKeuE+21LRWEMpD3tbNK+P474dBWjvO5txtVW7TQtCshHks05B1SG5p2osOp9x rmUj2aGSrNrvNqJFTq0g0ZIwlyqoys22bY9zwDyoCN3CIM1Au4g5+4g6vJ7pEK05n7JA xrvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=eaglescrag.net Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v19si3074273edc.193.2021.10.27.21.07.10; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=eaglescrag.net Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229762AbhJ1EHy (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:07:54 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:53574 "EHLO mail.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229645AbhJ1EHy (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:07:54 -0400 Received: from [IPV6:2620:137:e001:0:c663:d265:4cca:c19] (unknown [IPv6:2620:137:e001:0:c663:d265:4cca:c19]) by mail.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F00D04F69302C; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97a1d4b8-b6c1-8cfc-3978-6efd3e0925bd@eaglescrag.net> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: Unsubscription Incident Content-Language: en-MW To: Slade Watkins Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Shannon Nelson , Benjamin Poirier , Vladimir Oltean , Lijun Pan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Networking References: <61f29617-1334-ea71-bc35-0541b0104607@pensando.io> <20211027123408.0d4f36f2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <61e27841-5ceb-1975-ab3b-abdf8973c9f2@eaglescrag.net> From: John 'Warthog9' Hawley In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.monkeyblade.net [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/27/21 17:27, Slade Watkins wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 4:42 PM John 'Warthog9' Hawley > wrote: >> >> On 10/27/21 12:34 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:34:28 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote: >>>>>> It happened to a bunch of people on gmail: >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1fd8d0ac-ba8a-4836-59ab-0ed3b0321775@mojatatu.com/t/#u >>>>> I can at least confirm that this didn't happen to me on my hosted >>>>> Gmail through Google Workspace. Could be wrong, but it seems isolated >>>>> to normal @gmail.com accounts. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>> >>>> Alternatively, I can confirm that my pensando.io address through gmail >>>> was affected until I re-subscribed. >>> >>> Did it just work after re-subscribing again? Without cleaning the inbox? >>> John indicated off list that Gmail started returning errors related to >>> quota, no idea what that translates to in reality maybe they added some >>> heuristic on too many emails from one source? >> >> At least for the users I've had anyone mention to me (which for the >> record apparently this happened on the 11th, and people are only >> reaching out now about), the reasons for the unsubscribe was that the >> upstream servers were reporting that the users in question were over >> quota permanently. We take that hinting at face value, and since the >> server is telling us (basically) that the user isn't going to be >> accepting mail anytime soon, we go ahead and unsubscribe them and clear >> the queue so that the users don't cause unnecessary back log. Noting, >> this is an automated process that runs and deals with this that runs >> periodically. >> >> Also noting, that there's not a good way to notify individuals when this >> happens because, unsurprisingly, their email providers aren't accepting >> mail from us. >> >> If folks reach out to postmaster@ I'm more than happy to take a look at >> the 'why' something happened, and I'm happy to re-subscribe folks in the >> backend saving them the back and forth with majorodomo's command system. >> > > John, > That's great. > >> >> If I had to speculate, something glitched at gmail, a subset of users >> got an odd error code returned (which likely wasn't the correct error >> code for the situation, and noting the number of affected users is >> fairly small given the number of users from gmail that are subscribed). >> Likely similar to when gmail had that big outage and it reported >> something way off base and as a result every gmail user got unsubscribed >> (and subsequently resubscribed in the backend by me when the outage was >> over). >> > > Is there any way to detect if something like that affects Google > Workspace hosted inboxes too? Sounds like those in that group who were > affected were very few though but I thought I'd ask anyway. Looking back around then it looks like a few individual users might have been, but it's sporadic on the domains that aren't gmail.com, so it doesn't look like (to what I can see anyway) it was a full worksapce for instance. The real problem is the error that was getting kicked back was a generic enough error, that's it's hard to tell what users may have actually been over quota vs. something else. - John 'Warthog9' Hawley