Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu) by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:54:03 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:53:10 -0400 Received: from lancaster.nexor.co.uk ([193.63.53.1]:57597 "EHLO lancaster.nexor.co.uk") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:50:47 -0400 To: Russell King Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk (Jamie Lokier), drepper@redhat.com (Ulrich Drepper), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) Subject: Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:15:22 BST." <200007281315.OAA30398@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 02:09:30 +0100 From: David Howells Message-Id: <20000729005258Z157685-16386+2027@vger.rutgers.edu> Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 727 Lines: 18 Russell King writes: > David Howells writes: > > Why not /usr/modules or /usr/kernel for the stuff required to compile modules > > (in other words stuff that the kernel doesn't actually use), for example: > > All these discussions about moving stuff to /usr are forgetting one > fundamental point in the FHS - /usr is NOT guaranteed to be mounted > at boot. In fact, /usr may very well be shared between machines. You missed my point - put _compile_ time stuff under /usr/whatever and _runtime_ stuff under /lib/modules or /kernel David Howells - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/