Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20211028084520.4b96f93a@bootlin.com>
References: <20211027131953.9270-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <163535070902.935735.6368176213562383450@kwain> <20211028084520.4b96f93a@bootlin.com>
From:   Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] net: ipconfig: Release the rtnl_lock while waiting for carrier
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
To:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Message-ID: <163541046633.3482.18345071972962863993@kwain>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:41:06 +0200
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Maxime Chevallier (2021-10-28 08:45:20)
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:05:09 +0200
> Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org> wrote:
> >Quoting Maxime Chevallier (2021-10-27 15:19:53)
> >>=20
> >> Fixes: 73970055450e ("sfp: add SFP module support") =20
> >
> >Was this working with SFP modules before?
>=20
> From what I can tell, no. In that case, does it need a fixes tag ?
> It seems the problem has always been there, and booting an nfsroot
> never worked over SFP links.

In that case I'd say targeting net-next is fine.

Antoine