Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750840AbXACPGG (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:06:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750839AbXACPGG (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:06:06 -0500 Received: from rrcs-24-153-217-226.sw.biz.rr.com ([24.153.217.226]:56910 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750838AbXACPGF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:06:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes From: Steve Wise To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Roland Dreier , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org In-Reply-To: <20070103150230.GP6019@mellanox.co.il> References: <1167836172.4187.9.camel@stevo-desktop> <20070103150230.GP6019@mellanox.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:06:02 -0600 Message-Id: <1167836762.4187.15.camel@stevo-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 17:02 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I've run this code with mthca and didn't notice any performance > > degradation, but I wasn't specifically measuring cq_poll overhead in a > > tight loop... > > We were speaking about ib_req_notify_cq here, actually, not cq poll. > So what was tested? > Sorry, I meant req_notify. I didn't specifically measure the cost of req_notify before and after this change. I've been running the user mode perftest programs mainly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/