Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:10:16 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>
To: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH  v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
Message-ID: <20070103151015.GQ6019@mellanox.co.il>
Reply-To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>
References: <1167836762.4187.15.camel@stevo-desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1167836762.4187.15.camel@stevo-desktop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 793
Lines: 23

> > > I've run this code with mthca and didn't notice any performance
> > > degradation, but I wasn't specifically measuring cq_poll overhead in a
> > > tight loop...
> > 
> > We were speaking about ib_req_notify_cq here, actually, not cq poll.
> > So what was tested?
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I meant req_notify.  I didn't specifically measure the cost of
> req_notify before and after this change.
> 
> I've been running the user mode perftest programs mainly.  

So, it's not really activated a lot there.
You want something like IPoIB BW test.

-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/