Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:56:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
       Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@bull.net>,
       =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Dugu=E9?= <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>,
       Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19.1-rt15][RFC] - futex_requeue_pi implementation (requeue from futex1 to PI-futex2)
Message-ID: <20070103155609.GB11066@elte.hu>
References: <459BA267.1020706@bull.net> <20070103123536.GA9088@elte.hu> <459BBF15.5070505@bull.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <459BBF15.5070505@bull.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 815
Lines: 22


* Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar a ?crit :
> >
> >looks good to me in principle. The size of the patch is scary - is there 
> >really no simpler way? 
> 
> Humf, in fact, for the 64-bit part, I've followed the rule of the 
> existing 64-bit code in futex.c, which consists of duplicating all the 
> functions which can not be kept common, and add a suffix 64 to all 
> duplicated functions. Perhaps I missed something ?

i dont think you missed anything - but some consolidation here would be 
nice. Only if possible of course :-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/