Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc:     linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
References: <20211026115916.31553-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
 <8b3466f1-2b16-80ca-79c7-577860fc90aa@canonical.com>
 <CAPLW+4=YizLzdiZ1mdCGxvPCTYhNjeiomO=q=4Xk-ZxqqH++nA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable MCT timer for ARCH_EXYNOS
Message-ID: <e01b0072-008a-c83d-59b2-2174860c00fd@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:35:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4=YizLzdiZ1mdCGxvPCTYhNjeiomO=q=4Xk-ZxqqH++nA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 28/10/2021 16:22, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 17:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2021 13:59, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> Some ARM64 Exynos SoCs have MCT timer block, e.g. Exynos850 and
>>> Exynos5433. CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option is not visible unless COMPILE_TEST
>>> is enabled. Select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option for ARM64 ARCH_EXYNOS like
>>> it's done in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig, to enable MCT timer support
>>> for ARM64 Exynos SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>
>> +CC Marek, Marc, Mark and Chanwoo,
>> Looks like duplicated:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181018095708.1527-7-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/
>>
>> The topic stalled and I think this particular patch did not make sense
>> on its own, without rest of changes from Marek. I am not sure, though...
>>
> 
> Krzysztof, Marek,
> 
> That series looks nice, I'm quite interested in that being applied. Do
> you think I can do something to help with that (e.g. rebasing,
> re-sending on behalf of Marek, testing on Exynos850, etc)?

I think there were no objections against v4 of this patchset, but
somehow it wasn't applied.

Marek,
Does it make sense to try respinning your v4?

Best regards,
Krzysztof