Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1717253pxb; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8ZPvr/WBVb0CVJt6m+xkvjkxF8TTuL5CMi1VfDs1+YfUw71osc6OCHoxAr4ulSQrLw+PU X-Received: by 2002:a63:3f4f:: with SMTP id m76mr3818275pga.315.1635436068226; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635436068; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LryZSnULZGcE0ZcyjtfTe4YAtxjUq2SdJjX29NR8r0IeHEBKtysnd+/9tCII0sXo2E UdLFP0kGiT5lnOmWcLZcfauoBoT+X8saoTd0ymh8h/++fE150QNou5hA2GGVPDJPKx5+ mff64arhi2zTWprPl6SZQpQ04KPGlQP/vMQmEYB6E1P+RUwb9gr7OiLi4kraaXxWTd03 B03e/XD4NZUXaucDu/HDmCNJ/PR5pDVTsFbVcmNA92wAlCZ2tJ0pAFMUSL75HxHXTScQ cy0DVsUOkJMxOoatjBZ8TyqAKACWiOYIFEALHWJfI3+w1s/NRnU/flu/wT8aw/DazvgM zMAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=F4tMjT47BZ3DwbmAEWq81W0GAGbuRTe5m3IotIof8YU=; b=yDog1z1t6PBfQYII9HPe+rTWhIvvek8DtjLFFODkmOIlJZ3/AWwPLbTHMXO9LyFprz qvj8+AHDxwejgjbzhMYra+eQ+bM069uooUO1XgVYI6mQP24ZClwU+PrZBZ3PRKcrTmqA s3+Wz+jcWft/4Adxay7mCxv4qUS0nSxzL7EziiN+mexCGNT6nfC2OcqQ8Q2wluK27abG hBa4x2Yc7AmaMgbcFUQzrXZazmAd4fHsBeDWHCtmvpcruZoUamIojh+tGkm4NYERj8zi Lrc8t6yVIa755WYH62d/6mrlo7vu1uBEekvnVZ6J0b7dXzb7h2fSlInXezeCKQMNjFNw 7tog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=BjqOJFRO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x7si4428446pgr.92.2021.10.28.08.47.27; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=BjqOJFRO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230329AbhJ1Psj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:48:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:23087 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230295AbhJ1Psi (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:48:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635435970; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F4tMjT47BZ3DwbmAEWq81W0GAGbuRTe5m3IotIof8YU=; b=BjqOJFROTIOhDmJkCsO6Exs79jec8AvAq0YcQV3+y6zihBb/DGdQas3lnaz5aNxZE2hqbK WhObPml9ixi3GkAgkTvb2ovSasE+MsFT1a5iP4142pp+zyc0PR58hxt5QbukfE3NmyqktO zLewA7VN5IUax5mM4WnTFZ7PBNDdWt8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-192-HPiuQd71NyeJUfJbOWNqdw-1; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:46:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: HPiuQd71NyeJUfJbOWNqdw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02CB19251A0; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from starship (unknown [10.40.194.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9106C5DA61; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <06ed37a510347fdc7c6f7ce46fd98ce5b9ff7554.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 32/43] KVM: VMX: Move preemption timer <=> hrtimer dance to common x86 From: Maxim Levitsky To: Sean Christopherson , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini Cc: James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:45:14 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20211009021236.4122790-33-seanjc@google.com> References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-33-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 19:12 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Handle the switch to/from the hypervisor/software timer when a vCPU is > blocking in common x86 instead of in VMX. Even though VMX is the only > user of a hypervisor timer, the logic and all functions involved are > generic x86 (unless future CPUs do something completely different and > implement a hypervisor timer that runs regardless of mode). > > Handling the switch in common x86 will allow for the elimination of the > pre/post_blocks hooks, and also lets KVM switch back to the hypervisor > timer if and only if it was in use (without additional params). Add a > comment explaining why the switch cannot be deferred to kvm_sched_out() > or kvm_vcpu_block(). > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +----- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index b3bb2031a7ac..a24f19874716 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -7464,16 +7464,12 @@ void vmx_update_cpu_dirty_logging(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > static int vmx_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - if (kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu)) > - kvm_lapic_switch_to_sw_timer(vcpu); > - > return 0; > } > > static void vmx_post_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - if (kvm_x86_ops.set_hv_timer) > - kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(vcpu); > + > } > > static void vmx_setup_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index e0219acfd9cf..909e932a7ae7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -9896,8 +9896,21 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > + bool hv_timer; > + > if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) && > (!kvm_x86_ops.pre_block || static_call(kvm_x86_pre_block)(vcpu) == 0)) { > + /* > + * Switch to the software timer before halt-polling/blocking as > + * the guest's timer may be a break event for the vCPU, and the > + * hypervisor timer runs only when the CPU is in guest mode. > + * Switch before halt-polling so that KVM recognizes an expired > + * timer before blocking. > + */ I didn't knew about this until now but it all makes sense. The comment is very good. > + hv_timer = kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu); > + if (hv_timer) > + kvm_lapic_switch_to_sw_timer(vcpu); > + > srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx); > if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED) > kvm_vcpu_halt(vcpu); > @@ -9905,6 +9918,9 @@ static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu); > vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); > > + if (hv_timer) > + kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(vcpu); > + > if (kvm_x86_ops.post_block) > static_call(kvm_x86_post_block)(vcpu); > > @@ -10136,6 +10152,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > r = -EINTR; > goto out; > } > + /* > + * It should be impossible for the hypervisor timer to be in > + * use before KVM has ever run the vCPU. > + */ > + WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu)); > kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu); > if (kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu) < 0) { > r = 0; Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitsky