Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20211027220721.5a941815@canb.auug.org.au>
 <YXk5Uii+pNPaDiSR@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <2b553780-f0a8-f9d7-4401-65762952fbdd@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:10:02 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YXk5Uii+pNPaDiSR@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/27/21 4:34 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:07:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>> produced this warning:
>>
>> include/linux/phylink.h:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK(supported_interfaces' not described in 'phylink_config'
>>
>> Introduced by commit
>>
>>    38c310eb46f5 ("net: phylink: add MAC phy_interface_t bitmap")
>>
>> Or maybe this is a problem with the tool ...
> 
> Hmm. Looks like it is a tooling problem.
> 
>   * @supported_interfaces: bitmap describing which PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_xxx
>   *                        are supported by the MAC/PCS.
> 
>          DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK(supported_interfaces);
> 
> I'm guessing the tool doesn't use the preprocessed source. I'm not sure
> what the solution to this would be.
> 

I just sent a patch to scripts/kernel-doc to support that macro.

-- 
~Randy