Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932300AbXADHGh (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:06:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932303AbXADHGh (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:06:37 -0500 Received: from smtp0.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:53291 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932300AbXADHGg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:06:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:06:29 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Miller Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, torvalds@osdl.org, gelma@gelma.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM: Fix nasty and subtle race in shared mmap'ed page writeback Message-Id: <20070103230629.a2e734b9.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20070103.225607.133169483.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070103214121.997be3e6.akpm@osdl.org> <459C98BF.5080409@yahoo.com.au> <20070103221220.c4589831.akpm@osdl.org> <20070103.225607.133169483.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1861 Lines: 44 On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:56:07 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:12:20 -0800 > > > On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:03:43 +1100 > > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > > > That bug was introduced in 2.6.19, with the dirty page tracking patches. > > > > > > > > 2.6.18 and earlier used ->private_lock coverage in try_to_free_buffers() to > > > > prevent it. > > > > > > Ohh, right you are, I was looking at 2.6.19 sources. The comments above > > > ttfb match that as well. Curious that the dirty page patches were allowed > > > to mess with this... > > > > Frankly, those patches scared the crap out of me, specifically because of > > the delicacy and complexity of the various dirtiness state coherencies. > > But I just didn't have the bandwidth to go through them with a sufficiently > > fine toothcomb, sorry. > > > > > Anyway that leaves us with the question of why Andrea's database is getting > > > corrupted. Hopefully he can give us a minimal test-case. > > > > It'd odd that stories of pre-2.6.19 BerkeleyDB corruption are now coming > > out of the woodwork. It's the first I've ever heard of them. > > Note that the original rtorrent debian bug report was against 2.6.18 I think that was 2.6.18+debian-added-dirty-page-tracking-patches. If that memory is correct, I'll assert (and emphasise) that the cause of the alleged BerkeleyDB corruption is not known at this time. The post-2.6.19 "fix" might make it go away. But if it does, we do not know why, and it might still be there, only harder to hit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/