Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211031064046.13533-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <CAHp75Vf3TninFNRdz453sdqrQpu-2sqaiFd-rCqOFeo-kMCniw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vf3TninFNRdz453sdqrQpu-2sqaiFd-rCqOFeo-kMCniw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:42:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMhs-H-r2rUdhO3+-GfrOy+d7dXOBaN283Aqf3q5FqugLPpeMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: ralink: include 'ralink_regs.h' in 'pinctrl-mt7620.c'
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Andy,

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 2:08 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 8:41 AM Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > mt7620.h, included by pinctrl-mt7620.c, mentions MT762X_SOC_MT7628AN
> > declared in ralink_regs.h.
> >
> > Fixes: 745ec436de72 ("pinctrl: ralink: move MT7620 SoC pinmux config into a new 'pinctrl-mt7620.c' file")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
>
> Tag blocks mustn't have blank lines.

Ok, thanks for letting me know.

>
> ...
>
> > +#include <asm/mach-ralink/ralink_regs.h>
> >  #include <asm/mach-ralink/mt7620.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> Actually the rule of thumb is to start from more generic definitions /
> inclusions to more particular. Thus, asm/* usually goes after linux/*.
> Any Specific reason why here is not the case?

I just respect the order that was already in the files, I guess when I
moved all of this from arch/mips into drivers/pinctrl. All files
inside follows the same order.

Best regards,
    Sergio Paracuellos
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko