Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp2837828pxb; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:55:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDtEPPNFo15cEkFtQI64fcEc3+NPh6/pF8Cicu9LEUqBlzyb20e7xpYTtSbbpgfsF/N4Fk X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3542:: with SMTP id s2mr35383413eja.379.1635760530966; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 02:55:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635760530; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NJ0cQ0rwoItO9KZsdvrom+MGM8AzxoNEJz7zQSxLncWEzXs7CUu/NRsUpF3VQ3UjyV jaMNMT3E/Id79iwn7lvcqyUY0rzOLmD/vacB16BXp3/Ze8rjPrZ5y+CVTF+T2+nZgbzH V8RL6zVtzzaD7gRr3mGZGvQkrIRxk4IIK2jxR8MowfbIw0fli7aTV0PaljyRdntPzZxT suCahILSw2lClcwWUpyiKJ6wBaeHzRgIeKQcDmpV2/6PsKaJGnEMNmJjZa5D7GNrDpGH eWrfiEANAa8CvtKne3DiOdUy8PRz9d0xPfbodh3ON1N3kIjuOiWsq5TmyLnaCZrpWNm0 7c7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :to:subject; bh=4sA0P22xgXyDna9GAHOywI9HqvwjyHy7fJBiIqlrOi4=; b=LA9UwS3bz424QOzm0fpeZZaINpikh209sSaTyO7ml9CjbZhgDlZy3KOH3Pa6RW1dGu T5kvhOXj1QYNlhaUjQHYKuzXKndpNZ2R85nWckfHC3moJzcCwx4strbdzay05awPH47q 6KjqWaHXukjyGrBNzUAl8K0iU3VG7uWpO4x0e7933KjdXyakwS/skdIXlxNxHDKy/Odg Fo3Cwr3aP8cxHisEI373/iIP91YvjuhGEnOGHy/a0KBrej88uSCZ9KgldSupdvsDY1P/ T5UvVLsMW8svNL1cCzaSK82wZsaBhhUh3zRla2d2ML01ZGebOlN4U2oHzhoUJ5+TeKgM L9aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9si10777663eds.418.2021.11.01.02.55.07; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 02:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234141AbhKAJzO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 05:55:14 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36712 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233594AbhKAJvn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 05:51:43 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EB3106F; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.47.15] (unknown [10.57.47.15]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90E083F719; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] coresight: etm4x: Add lock for reading virtual context ID comparator To: Leo Yan , Mathieu Poirier , Mike Leach , Alexander Shishkin , James Clark , coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211031144214.237879-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20211031144214.237879-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:49:06 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211031144214.237879-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Leo On 31/10/2021 14:42, Leo Yan wrote: > When read the virtual context ID comparator value via sysfs node, the > driver firstly reads out the index, then reads the comparator value > based on index. > > This patch adds the spinlock to protect the atomicity for up two steps. minor nit: This could be : "Updates to the values and the index are protected via the spinlock. Ensure we use the same lock to read the value safely" With that: Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose