Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:22:58 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Xuesong Chen <xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, helgaas@kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
        james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering
Message-ID: <YX/cIhZDgUGI3FKd@zn.tnic>
References: <YW5OTMz+x8zrsqkF@Dennis-MBP.local>
 <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com>
 <e387413f-dbe8-e0f1-257b-141362d74e3a@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck>
 <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:12:15PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote:
> I'm very sorry about the non-constructived response, and I'd like to
> take this chance to withdraw them entirely... personally this is not a
> good example in terms of the mood or the way of expression.

Good idea. There are other maintainers who would ignore you indefinitely
for uncalled for explosions like that. And then you would have achieved
the opposite of what you were aiming for, with that rant.

To Will's point, you can always read Documentation/process/ while
waiting for your patches to get reviewed - there the whole process is
explained and what the best ways and times are to send a patchset.

HTH.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette