Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:18:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: Use kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC in
 atomic context
Message-ID: <YYAFK83uzfBn03D/@kroah.com>
References: <20211101142732.5638-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211101142732.5638-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Use the GFP_ATOMIC flag of kzalloc() with two memory allocation in
> report_del_sta_event(). This function is called while holding spinlocks,
> therefore it is not allowed to sleep. With the GFP_ATOMIC type flag, the
> allocation is high priority and must not sleep.
> 
> This issue is detected by Smatch which emits the following warning:
> "drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:6848 report_del_sta_event()
> warn: sleeping in atomic context".
> 
> After the change, the post-commit hook output the following message:
> "CHECK: Prefer kzalloc(sizeof(*pcmd_obj)...) over
> kzalloc(sizeof(struct cmd_obj)...)".
> 
> According to the above "CHECK", use the preferred style in the first
> kzalloc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> v1->v2: Fix an overlooked error due to an incorrect copy-paste
> 	of the sizeof() operator.

What commit does this fix?

thanks,

greg k-h