Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:18:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:18:28 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:49426 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:18:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:17:51 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Cc: Remco Post , James A Sutherland , , Subject: Re: Swap In-Reply-To: <1922542962.1006204382@[195.224.237.69]> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: > --On Monday, 19 November, 2001 2:58 PM -0200 Rik van Riel > wrote: > > > Guess again. Linux doesn't have load control implemented ... > > Out of interest, is received wisdom that this is a good/bad > thing? Load control is a good thing since it means the box gets slower in a controlled way instead of running fine one minute and horribly falling over the next minute. I'm certainly planning to implement some load control measures for 2.5. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/