Message-ID: <459D3C65.2090703@qumranet.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:41:57 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
CC: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables
References: <459D21DD.5090506@qumranet.com> <20070104092226.91fa2dfe.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070104092226.91fa2dfe.akpm@osdl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 796
Lines: 21

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we
> have now and hold this off for 2.6.21?
>   

Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them 
(and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20:

- kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that
- this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and 
a generally usable system
- from my testing, it's quite stable

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/