Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp4872109pxb; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 17:52:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEWiWKClgWmW31GOopOLYEyx/tGsYPaWPOUEZa9w0vCsf4E/0erxclYrNMTKdPgBtyX+0Z X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2f97:: with SMTP id w23mr41394261eji.31.1635900725966; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:52:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635900725; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zD0xhVsgminTOeqgAp6hdyM/UAIUlw9AzAzciIFEIL7IBiRniPQvXUDg2uuLYvQujX SPvloSgvXBamm0ncGHFdh2NDFoi6FBuyLsKcsXuwNP+mwwUKjvc1HwcopbUm+sLd4nDt cOd1j3uUvyvCa442tFW3/VvaV8n5+1eH12hf8GNewjMSysfa21Qd9Kt9FOIZbwwl0Yhg UqWSkNRn67lMiAC5SN3fy1emiHBBU9I5RF7X1GLE98S3hVNmBipEdlWUmTlDlhsv+GSu AmeI1WKRxP9S4Pp3iC0dlkYTsAbEcZmJeMzyEOVv02gkpVECI3abjc8ORR920/yHSuZQ bsFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=kZZrLtjwjEJ3IPsG9yhz+Qsv7Mbcxqz9ceN0wVwrxJA=; b=sPG/Tv7I8MWh/S64OtFngpm5bTKrWqyMWbKqS6KXFg2HffVhnGEzfsZlb6hHL3hOGu Hc6tSbTSyYWPkcrP1NIRTw8C8pgroQezt5Tnt9KdGNF58wCvaf07dop4MWBnAUwH0HAT pJqhbMG+1ktdI3M16GKMlJ0DTXUlOAcubH3eSvGLPFAW88iEYvmjZndZPin7bWZiO0Hh t9PrJjVDfZtK1azVwxaZBiYgGpN3gCHvmcqMN172SJfIFb5WDO7U/5e8tr4o9uvVPxsC ozusccyzcBf6pR+JGViiL8eX9rx2qBmg9vrQzVpwxWWcREle9cYADzPWiUKuR42z3ufi CGbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b="JRgj/oln"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mj23si843944ejb.591.2021.11.02.17.51.39; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b="JRgj/oln"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231649AbhKCAwB (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 20:52:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43532 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231311AbhKCAv7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 20:51:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78365C061203 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 17:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id x16-20020a17090a789000b001a69735b339so138409pjk.5 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:49:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kZZrLtjwjEJ3IPsG9yhz+Qsv7Mbcxqz9ceN0wVwrxJA=; b=JRgj/olnX5KG4c7O7Xm0Jry+oiIPPVRs0ttrw6gNfqqnI1KamWVto+1Pxon2fIWDB1 x1F3THYxTFa5CE7AzpmpAplt8VFcFKfqy3d3MAGp0s5nJkBUy9JedsZ+4OS6KUAKM+vB DvCegoQKw1vFIw4wXLe3UECLM26Wd75Cn2MgSkM0NOQW/tEUxE7RV1jJdp+3GjtYuyB8 qk4COR6f2KXYi8/R57t9nLZVLeQ2fx8WIoFzd2PpFjGLiu6nnZ/mrHGax9Rr3YH4SIxn s76DGqePmbOMyvjyajU4ySIeJgRloDb6/b5JkF/zEIEF+UPqSUTfuYb6YiGVu536BR06 QRCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kZZrLtjwjEJ3IPsG9yhz+Qsv7Mbcxqz9ceN0wVwrxJA=; b=UWsA94ACFrr4fntoouwPtu4NeKCmHItikwDwixS4UnzNYwRP/SEbQTxAPz3aaWuTaO tJp7r9xrcsVK2oxqkpT5b4hJnmYnvVH/vgOL9H2JvlWjWn+uJ6oLrVklvUl9ioHJ4FHQ 5sS61D9YvIsCTF4RSqXQZR1yMcsR783b/lxagnn8kHudVkP6KUrXPzAuRgtNzAIK7aCH pxi3JLJ1QdnDsUFzxboXdjvIxWdi/u7EAN8SfakezuKaa11ZC0+260wkiFwCjDXDMlRr I5u6h+Y6RhwoI/u5Xv9SvN0CvZnSaCvmDyD0+3ZeBMTpWDpUYDt86W9vhjRdtn+uGft2 s7eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hcHa55v7UqFtKy6oKM4+QwfFo9HHrPrDggWM+LOPlynhDdMB0 Bvde8tmKYi14T77mUKhERrM/I5EKQ/D6zjntrT4qTg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b88:: with SMTP id pc8mr10700972pjb.93.1635900563928; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:49:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211015235219.2191207-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20211015235219.2191207-7-mcgrof@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 17:49:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] nvdimm/blk: avoid calling del_gendisk() on early failures To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Jens Axboe , Geoff Levand , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Jim Paris , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , senozhatsky@chromium.org, Richard Weinberger , miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, vigneshr@ti.com, Vishal L Verma , Dave Jiang , "Weiny, Ira" , Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Linux NVDIMM , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:10 PM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:13:48PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > > > If nd_integrity_init() fails we'd get del_gendisk() called, > > > but that's not correct as we should only call that if we're > > > done with device_add_disk(). Fix this by providing unwinding > > > prior to the devm call being registered and moving the devm > > > registration to the very end. > > > > > > This should fix calling del_gendisk() if nd_integrity_init() > > > fails. I only spotted this issue through code inspection. It > > > does not fix any real world bug. > > > > > > > Just fyi, I'm preparing patches to delete this driver completely as it > > is unused by any shipping platform. I hope to get that removal into > > v5.16. > > Curious if are you going to nuking it on v5.16? Otherwise it would stand > in the way of the last few patches to add __must_check for the final > add_disk() error handling changes. True, I don't think I can get it nuked in time, so you can add my Reviewed-by for this one.