Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a4b3951d1191d4183d92a07a6097566bde60d00a.1629812058.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
 <163584790624.1845480.1785827913484538939.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
 <CAHC9VhROvSQHVQ6Wo8zHND1rGm+r6dGJur69B65sJ9JwNvMDpQ@mail.gmail.com> <87a6im87tq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <87a6im87tq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 21:15:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSXVc534jzZ9bSD5fbuJpaGY=mswv4crOW28y7AjhG7Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:19 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:38 AM Michael Ellerman
> > <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:36:13 +0000 (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> > Commit e65e1fc2d24b ("[PATCH] syscall class hookup for all normal
> >> > targets") added generic support for AUDIT but that didn't include
> >> > support for bi-arch like powerpc.
> >> >
> >> > Commit 4b58841149dc ("audit: Add generic compat syscall support")
> >> > added generic support for bi-arch.
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> Applied to powerpc/next.
> >>
> >> [1/1] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC
> >>       https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/566af8cda399c088763d07464463dc871c943b54
> >
> > Did the test failure discussed earlier in this thread ever get
> > resolved?  If not, this really shouldn't be in linux-next IMO.
>
> It's not in next, that notification is from the b4 thanks script, which
> didn't notice that the commit has since been reverted.

Okay, thanks for the clarification.  I know we had already talked
about this so I was a little caught off guard when I saw this mail :)

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com