Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp181978pxb; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1CHkDhoT00os6OjVKyChFOvuKOhsCi3QpAp1CCK5yp71Adz82c5OAcY7OCukA9pOG01dN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:288:: with SMTP id c8mr17478302jaq.60.1635931073458; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:17:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635931073; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Pufh5xSHm3l5J2t1gCXNq4ZL7uv5n3rjHAcbvO26VZj21XwMfJ2Wygl3Wy30BIjUP9 Uq72fWfOg5ZUK9gB5UQeROTDoGSqsxkxFJwYXF7ULjAjNNoEqqOHXTEGvDwFPzFslRJG fk+/HozRVMMsS2zkx4/vh45YLHzATmBgGw+uVWrQ7bnHTzJyGo8bWmNtuFFwWvQ052Nk 6SqXYlP2wTyHUfdP5oYxNl/gKODXFk6NiVXnzemcc31AfVwOsLMFZXLLefSpJnnOF6Lm 5GnwcopaSGxtilGgyuWaif3iTHcDd2cHzUgA4sIhZIHT54Gn3uNGhZ+LgET09d1MbrGJ etlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=XJcs38o+tTuQNa7N2XtrSoHl3yz1DXdWEW/Va0sveVQ=; b=PwY4jCoe0bACRk/KcP6AJocyWKncuRSvVKTxLeuzMFhxuqvVEDwmOLbNjffYLa0gBA 7NC+TurMgwnFwwLyWpPoSlS4i7+7dJ0fcBg9CL5mHWgiGEByuMaHAyuFbOwgrfqoFmRB SpIaUXT93c10TRCZQ8CpkQL8gg2z6NogsnBmx+bpCwNO1uf0BxY/cQ/NztAsnSLarcgO p5lXqB98/Q5cwYSlpdAVtHz9/zxtC5aNZ+TJr2uST6Rp57jPIPboX+r85tbSQZVk9OWp Oeb5uv+do8k/k1/VqX9FZTJBR8mJvQkvZiKNfVI5vlYvIVIiH9d6HqQmK8sIMXw9mmK1 2log== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=WSE5CajR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l5si2513426ilh.2.2021.11.03.02.17.41; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=WSE5CajR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231435AbhKCJTX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:19:23 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([185.132.182.106]:43652 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230463AbhKCJTW (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:19:22 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046668.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 1A38cIo1021313; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:16:36 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=XJcs38o+tTuQNa7N2XtrSoHl3yz1DXdWEW/Va0sveVQ=; b=WSE5CajRoM3VtvDxjXhHzn+nEG41Oevg/wG4VzlORE2xL29IxRTfVwqxmQ5jBBeCF2gK cwEG2C+CTQbp5Sc2oHSZPOEcCYTOPNEWCvlVLJggSbmLxNT///AxSLna8kZflccd10hg 24j8vIoHJYc64L+kasB6OENgdedVQpVuzJI0ufVyZzGZ3qLDdgrVGP1bQx6w0D7w1KgD 080Yh9JvMcxaK4Z6qHQO5kQig5a1SKGpd0a2UL3lPnjICQtKRSGyIWMGISSvbbjZF5Ut RhT4HlmVoZRfOqf70mbeXMan8E1kbLMy3J9FuFjt96AtKrbodd/3mbeuwo2oW8h/wtw2 Kg== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3c3db9321t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:16:36 +0100 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 8A32C10002A; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:16:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag2node2.st.com [10.75.127.5]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 787E421ED25; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:16:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from lmecxl0889.lme.st.com (10.75.127.49) by SFHDAG2NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:16:34 +0100 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] remoteproc: Instantiate the new remoteproc virtio platform device To: Mathieu Poirier CC: Bjorn Andersson , Ohad Ben-Cohen , , , , Rob Herring , Christoph Hellwig , Stefano Stabellini , Bruce Ashfield References: <20211001101234.4247-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20211001101234.4247-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20211022175857.GD3659113@p14s> From: Arnaud POULIQUEN Message-ID: <76582f13-9be8-60b6-21c9-7e45569e90d8@foss.st.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:16:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211022175857.GD3659113@p14s> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.49] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG2NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.4) To SFHDAG2NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.5) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-11-03_02,2021-11-02_01,2020-04-07_01 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mathieu On 10/22/21 7:58 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:12:34PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >> Migrate from the rvdev device to the rvdev platform device. >> From this patch, when a vdev resource is found in the resource table >> the remoteproc core register a platform device. >> >> All reference to the rvdev->dev has been updated to rvdev-pdev->dev >> >> The use of kref counter is replaced by get/put_device on the remoteproc >> virtio device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 49 +++++++------ >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ---- >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 93 ++++++------------------ >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 - >> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index 67ccd088db8f..d9256db8b130 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, >> { >> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr; >> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; >> + struct rproc_vdev_data vdev_data; >> + struct platform_device *pdev; >> struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; >> int i, ret; >> >> @@ -486,28 +488,34 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, >> dev_dbg(dev, "vdev rsc: id %d, dfeatures 0x%x, cfg len %d, %d vrings\n", >> rsc->id, rsc->dfeatures, rsc->config_len, rsc->num_of_vrings); >> >> - /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ >> - if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) { >> - dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings); >> - return -EINVAL; >> - } >> + /* platform data of the new rvdev platform */ >> + vdev_data.rsc_offset = offset; >> + vdev_data.id = rsc->id; >> + vdev_data.index = rproc->nb_vdev; >> >> - rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL); >> - if (!rvdev) >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - >> - kref_init(&rvdev->refcount); >> - >> - rvdev->id = rsc->id; >> - rvdev->rproc = rproc; >> - rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev; >> + pdev = rproc_virtio_register_device(rproc, &vdev_data); >> + if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) { >> + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, >> + "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev); >> + } >> >> - ret = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rvdev); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> + /* If we made it to this point the remote proc virtio platform at been probed */ >> + rvdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + if (WARN_ON(!rvdev)) { >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto free_rvdev; >> + } >> >> rproc->nb_vdev++; >> >> + /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ >> + if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings); >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto free_rvdev; >> + } >> + >> /* parse the vrings */ >> for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { >> ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i); >> @@ -515,9 +523,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, >> goto free_rvdev; >> } >> >> - /* remember the resource offset*/ >> - rvdev->rsc_offset = offset; >> - >> /* allocate the vring resources */ >> for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { >> ret = rproc_alloc_vring(rvdev, i); >> @@ -531,7 +536,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, >> for (i--; i >= 0; i--) >> rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]); >> free_rvdev: >> - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); >> + rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev); >> return ret; >> } > > I have made it up to here but running out of time for this patchset. I will review > the rest in another revision. I haven't found a justification for > rproc_register_rvdev() and rproc_unregister_rvdev(). Am I missing something or > they can simply be removed and the list manipulations done in the code as it > currently is? > You are right, it seems unnecessary. I need to double check why I introduced these functions, but this needs at least a rational in the commit. I will send a new revision taking into account your and Bjorn's remarks. Thanks, Arnaud > Thanks, > Mathieu > >> >> @@ -1270,7 +1275,7 @@ void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> /* clean up remote vdev entries */ >> list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) >> - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); >> + rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev); >> >> rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc); >> } >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> index 0bb1b14e5136..2f68e7380c77 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> @@ -38,12 +38,10 @@ int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, >> /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ >> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_VIRTIO) >> >> -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev); >> struct platform_device * >> rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *vdev_data); >> void rproc_virtio_unregister_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev); >> irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); >> -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); >> >> #else >> >> @@ -59,14 +57,6 @@ static inline void rproc_virtio_unregister_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) >> WARN_ON(1); >> } >> >> -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) >> -{ >> - /* This shouldn't be possible */ >> - WARN_ON(1); >> - >> - return -ENXIO; >> -} >> - >> static inline irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id) >> { >> /* This shouldn't be possible */ >> @@ -75,12 +65,6 @@ static inline irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id) >> return IRQ_NONE; >> } >> >> -static inline void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) >> -{ >> - /* This shouldn't be possible */ >> - WARN_ON(1); >> -} >> - >> #endif >> >> /* from remoteproc_debugfs.c */ >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >> index 7188fb8ce40f..34781a2136e6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c >> @@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ >> >> static struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> { >> - return container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct rproc_vdev, dev); >> + struct platform_device *pdev; >> + >> + pdev = container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct platform_device, dev); >> + >> + return platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> } >> >> static struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> @@ -343,13 +347,10 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) >> { >> struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); >> struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev); >> - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); >> >> kfree(vdev); >> >> - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); >> - >> - put_device(&rproc->dev); >> + put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev); >> } >> >> /** >> @@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) >> static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) >> { >> struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; >> - struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev; >> + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; >> struct virtio_device *vdev; >> struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; >> int ret; >> @@ -436,17 +437,15 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) >> vdev->dev.release = rproc_virtio_dev_release; >> >> /* >> - * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer >> + * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rvdev pointer >> * here, because drivers probed with this vdev will indirectly >> * access the wrapping rproc. >> * >> - * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement >> + * Therefore we must increment the rvdev refcount here, and decrement >> * it _only_ when the vdev is released. >> */ >> - get_device(&rproc->dev); >> + get_device(dev); >> >> - /* Reference the vdev and vring allocations */ >> - kref_get(&rvdev->refcount); >> >> ret = register_virtio_device(vdev); >> if (ret) { >> @@ -488,57 +487,33 @@ static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) >> static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed) >> { >> struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev); >> + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; >> int ret; >> >> - ret = device_for_each_child(&rvdev->dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); >> + ret = device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); >> if (ret) >> - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); >> -} >> - >> -/** >> - * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev >> - * >> - * @dev: the subdevice's dev >> - */ >> -static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev) >> -{ >> - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev); >> - >> - of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev); >> - >> - kfree(rvdev); >> + dev_warn(dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); >> } >> >> -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) >> +static int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) >> { >> struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; >> - char name[16]; >> + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; >> int ret; >> >> - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index); >> - rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev; >> - ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent); >> + ret = copy_dma_range_map(dev, rproc->dev.parent); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release; >> - dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name); >> - dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev); >> >> - ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev); >> - if (ret) { >> - put_device(&rvdev->dev); >> - return ret; >> - } >> /* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */ >> - set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); >> + set_dma_ops(dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); >> >> - ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev, >> - dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); >> + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); >> if (ret) { >> - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, >> - "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... %x\n", >> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... %x\n", >> dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ret); >> + return ret; >> } >> >> rproc_register_rvdev(rvdev); >> @@ -548,30 +523,9 @@ int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) >> >> rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); >> >> - return 0; >> -} >> - >> -static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) >> -{ >> - struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; >> - >> - rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); >> - rproc_unregister_rvdev(rvdev); >> - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); >> -} >> - >> -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) >> -{ >> - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount); >> - struct rproc_vring *rvring; >> - int id; >> + dev_dbg(dev, "virtio dev %d added\n", rvdev->index); >> >> - for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) { >> - rvring = &rvdev->vring[id]; >> - rproc_free_vring(rvring); >> - } >> - >> - rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev); >> + return 0; >> } >> >> /** >> @@ -590,8 +544,7 @@ rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *vdev_d >> pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "rproc-virtio", vdev_data->index, vdev_data, >> sizeof(*vdev_data)); >> if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) { >> - dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, >> - "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); >> + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); >> } >> >> return pdev; >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> index 542a3d4664f2..7951a3e2b62a 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> @@ -614,10 +614,8 @@ struct rproc_vring { >> >> /** >> * struct rproc_vdev - remoteproc state for a supported virtio device >> - * @refcount: reference counter for the vdev and vring allocations >> * @subdev: handle for registering the vdev as a rproc subdevice >> * @pdev: remoteproc virtio platform device >> - * @dev: device struct used for reference count semantics >> * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h) >> * @node: list node >> * @rproc: the rproc handle >> @@ -626,11 +624,9 @@ struct rproc_vring { >> * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table >> */ >> struct rproc_vdev { >> - struct kref refcount; >> >> struct rproc_subdev subdev; >> struct platform_device *pdev; >> - struct device dev; >> >> unsigned int id; >> struct list_head node; >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>