Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp276493pxb; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 04:09:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwouujXGmqGeeqzIBZYmiryn91IJvmlWG+5rDNKk+AOmdkSF6fwpZE0/Ksq/j6AlAbLssdx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c57:: with SMTP id t23mr29679750ejf.375.1635937780166; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 04:09:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635937780; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=X6pEUNQwZbYqOsuuxj1v3ISxHkz1+UxVU62/u3oX4j9e8PAnq8tGGEIrjPoI9S8QAX bcE2a4WqQM32TK+Tcrxbfmg8DfrhIvMjqy9SBWeJe3w15WiVVM0MPNYXeUUizktHxtC9 gN2fR3ZuVTqxIbfJLth4rM96CulDFEJkspeZ7QFpwFtGumybquAjmWwGyVwqB/3/oSOc J8fn9T2x+C+x5WauNVZVHfcudH4cqVXMduj7HwZanPKfFsXzVDeKXF4+03TOOIPa0G74 RUDIWxuQwfLC5rqDdVXko3/dXPx077y4woNiZ3nOnizx3+dSNHpecmM4fiJmuauJijB4 B54g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=xNRRrf8t2Tgo7riqsZpEUj4Oe993UMREh+0QFfAvLRE=; b=dxbwGHg7gALqWzSNG9kJkwkuQ9xT9byDhqh1qzWBwYXUZPbokQLoPCBCbVCyMZDu7t H8gW0ubBQBMACBAqYhz9iY6y50I7knYbW6+Vxra5XIggf8NcYxrcNJsDJwmzEgIgEfl0 D6sY948ErdNGiPMCDZ9vh9xRmPWNVGJfo3jC595sjKDQx967q+1jrAT29yuqmauQWruL OH8MJhJsaUuRgeCwnMLSiyaPFc2c7qfJA0CjcrDpaDTGoOf2G4F3KPsgTp5ird0AAzjz xeEz/emNibUfNhnXK1MxHk2BSJURb1roXrmuX6BLiStJMJcVJxGbsngt4nwgdSZkL03R kj5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b89si2650563edf.181.2021.11.03.04.09.15; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 04:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231393AbhKCLHS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Nov 2021 07:07:18 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:43284 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229506AbhKCLHS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2021 07:07:18 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:2a0d:6fc0:11c8:f600:2430:3a4b:db98:84e5] (unknown [IPv6:2a0d:6fc0:11c8:f600:2430:3a4b:db98:84e5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dafna) by bhuna.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F3A41F455A9; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 11:04:38 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: mtk-vpu: Ensure alignment of 8 for DTCM buffer To: Irui Wang , houlong wei , Alexandre Courbot , Hans Verkuil Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , LKML , "kernel@collabora.com" , Dafna Hirschfeld , =?UTF-8?B?VGlmZmFueSBMaW4gKOael+aFp+ePiik=?= , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmV3LUNUIENoZW4gKOmZs+aZuui/qik=?= , =?UTF-8?B?TWluZ2hzaXUgVHNhaSAo6JSh5piO5L+uKQ==?= , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthias Brugger References: <20210920170408.1561-1-dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com> <9475ac5b-79fe-da0e-ed1c-a91275cad46e@collabora.com> <8dfc07306b853126e8109fc953fd6388b63c65d2.camel@mediatek.com> From: Dafna Hirschfeld Message-ID: <4e7ff420-f67d-5d4a-8733-f4b83d80af13@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:04:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8dfc07306b853126e8109fc953fd6388b63c65d2.camel@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03.11.21 10:19, Irui Wang wrote: > Hi, > > The "len" of share_buf copied should be always 8 alignment; > do you have other logs to prove the len is not 8 alignment when errors > appear? Hi, I found out that "sizeof(mdp_ipi_comm) = 20" this is due to the macro #pragma pack(push, 4) in mtk_mdp_ipi.h see [1] [1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2109.2/04978.html Thanks, Dafna >>> [58.350841] mtk-mdp 14001000.rdma: processing failed: -22 > > On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 16:03 +0800, houlong wei wrote: >> Add mtk-vpu driver expert irui.wang in the loop. >> >> On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 15:07 +0800, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: >>> >>> On 18.10.21 03:16, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>>> Hi Hans! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 6:37 PM Hans Verkuil >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 20/09/2021 19:04, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: >>>>>> From: Alexandre Courbot >>>>>> >>>>>> When running memcpy_toio: >>>>>> memcpy_toio(send_obj->share_buf, buf, len); >>>>>> it was found that errors appear if len is not a multiple of >>>>>> 8: >>>>>> >>>>>> [58.350841] mtk-mdp 14001000.rdma: processing failed: -22 >>>>> >>>>> Why do errors appear? Is that due to a HW bug? Some other >>>>> reason? >>>> >>>> MTK folks would be the best placed to answer this, but since the >>>> failure is reported by the firmware I'd suspect either a firmware >>>> or >>>> hardware limitation. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This patch ensures the copy of a multiple of 8 size by >>>>>> calling >>>>>> round_up(len, 8) when copying >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: e6599adfad30 ("media: mtk-vpu: avoid unaligned access >>>>>> to >>>>>> DTCM buffer.") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra < >>>>>> enric.balletbo@collabora.com> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld < >>>>>> dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Houlong Wei >>>>>> --- >>>>>> changes since v3: >>>>>> 1. multile -> multiple >>>>>> 2. add inline doc >>>>>> >>>>>> changes since v2: >>>>>> 1. do the extra copy only if len is not multiple of 8 >>>>>> >>>>>> changes since v1: >>>>>> 1. change sign-off-by tags >>>>>> 2. change values to memset >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/media/platform/mtk-vpu/mtk_vpu.c | 15 >>>>>> ++++++++++++++- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vpu/mtk_vpu.c >>>>>> b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vpu/mtk_vpu.c >>>>>> index ec290dde59cf..1df031716c8f 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vpu/mtk_vpu.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vpu/mtk_vpu.c >>>>>> @@ -349,7 +349,20 @@ int vpu_ipi_send(struct platform_device >>>>>> *pdev, >>>>>> } >>>>>> } while (vpu_cfg_readl(vpu, HOST_TO_VPU)); >>>>>> >>>>>> - memcpy_toio(send_obj->share_buf, buf, len); >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * when copying data to the vpu hardware, the >>>>>> memcpy_toio >>>>>> operation must copy >>>>>> + * a multiple of 8. Otherwise the processing fails >>>>> >>>>> Same here: it needs to explain why the processing fails. >>> >>> Is writing 'due to hardware or firmware limitation' enough? >>> If not, then we should wait for mediatek people's response to >>> explain >>> if they know more >>> >>>>> >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + if (len % 8 != 0) { >>>>>> + unsigned char data[SHARE_BUF_SIZE]; >>>>> >>>>> Wouldn't it be more robust if you say: >>>>> >>>>> unsigned char data[sizeof(send_obj- >>>>>> share_buf)]; >>>> >>>> Definitely yes. >>> >>> I'll send v5 fixing this >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I also think that the SHARE_BUF_SIZE define needs a comment >>>>> stating that it must be a >>>>> multiple of 8, otherwise unexpected things can happen. >>>>> >>>>> You also noticed that the current SHARE_BUF_SIZE define is too >>>>> low, but I saw >>>>> no patch correcting this. Shouldn't that be fixed as well? >>>> >>>> AFAICT the firmware expects this exact size on its end, so I >>>> don't >>>> believe it can be changed that easily. But maybe someone from MTK >>>> can >>>> prove me wrong. >>>> >>> >>> I looked further and noted that the structs that are larger than >>> 'SHARE_BUF_SIZE' >>> (venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc_ext venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param_ext) >>> are used by drivers that don't use this vpu api, so actually >>> SHARE_BUF_SIZE is >>> not too low and as Corurbot worte probably not changeable. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dafna >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alex. >>>> >> >>