Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1160998AbXAEHnu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:43:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1160999AbXAEHnu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:43:50 -0500 Received: from mailgw.cvut.cz ([147.32.3.235]:37343 "EHLO mailgw.cvut.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1160998AbXAEHnt (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:43:49 -0500 Message-ID: <459E01B2.50309@vc.cvut.cz> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:43:46 -0800 From: Petr Vandrovec User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061219 Iceape/1.0.7 (Debian-1.0.7-1) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Ossman CC: LKML Subject: Re: NCPFS and brittle connections References: <459D1794.2060009@drzeus.cx> <459D38DA.4030803@vc.cvut.cz> <459D55E3.4000905@drzeus.cx> In-Reply-To: <459D55E3.4000905@drzeus.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2084 Lines: 44 Pierre Ossman wrote: > Petr Vandrovec wrote: >> Nobody is working on it (at least to my knowledge), and to me it is >> feature - it always worked this way, like smbfs did back in the past - >> if you send signal 9 to process using mount point, and there is some >> transaction in progress, nobody can correctly finish that transaction >> anymore. Fixing it would require non-trivial amount of code, and >> given that NCP itself is more or less dead protocol I do not feel that >> it is necessary. >> > > Someone needs to tell our customers then so they'll stop using it. :) When I asked at Brainshare 2001 when support for files over 4GB files will be added to NCP, they told me that I should switch to CIFS or NFS... Years after that confirmed it - only NW6.5SP3 finally got NCPs to support for files over 4GB, although you could have such files even on NW5. >> If you want to fix it, feel free. Culprit is RQ_INPROGRESS handling >> in ncp_abort_request - it just aborts whole connection so it does not >> have to provide temporary buffers and special handling for reply - as >> buffers currently specified as reply buffers are owned by caller, so >> after aborting request you cannot use them anymore. > > Do you have any pointers to how it was solved with smbfs? Relevant > patches perhaps? Provided a similar solution can be applied here. I believe it was fixed when smbiod was introduced. When find_request() returns failure, it simple throws away data received from network. Unfortunately NCP does not run on top of TCP stream, but on top of IPX/UDP, and so dropping reply is not sufficient - you must continue resending request (so you must buffer it somewhere...) until you get result from server - after you receive answer from server, you can finally throw away both request & reply, and move on. Petr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/