Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp729492pxb; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxNO9Op+zVfkDD3q4+p4ywETtZ1XgLzd3XpptMjHNmZKmoPvuCto8ZCPqQq0vp0G42otsN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1487:: with SMTP id a7mr21894298iow.114.1635963695062; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635963695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t3yPZyJ7jmmTh29IomeDweDNdpZmi75p3JkToF0seCGguEDhPchvjVAef5nR8OzxzC B2vC8riDmOhqp7TPf/OgpnQU88lggXrMuD09quu7iFjedFdXXQrA4z5lUbNCcg3MdYZp d/PAtlfLiduur0tp0d+yJWPj+KhG3wp7FPXN0uHVwDXwDrREKYH5GbW6FIH0uV8ENcQb N47bvx41xkmh8mQfEpFqpp6qums9HBTT13IgEHKCovz2yq8bwZmCU8Rct4q1OJ5cuFKt s7BEk8LcQTbACnOWSShyFXfauUiklwCQhC0P/LrrkaKTa6Ewj8k2mJkYZc2QOiI5u9ys kEbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=SIQXqypvAcQDTFfsbbA9kQGlHz4WNuqLp8mpX7Yrw1c=; b=Kgf7G7a4vgB3nzzGIH0hAFfdXkxnD9yDISIkUCBg393uapMTK1xYGgfGiZUOzS9tYD IwnZVQzSzTZWcE3fMv36yBBvZFU0uTEzDDY3V3NKs6/szgQNccuHbxJbp3N79E1a2FR5 xLB9/Z8mms8CdJmK9gmJlC95YcEphuIpUpK5O6bWL85HM7GhpFXsBANI8duWcqoDnzzg lUXsXO0jspezY8f2SlE/XkK4ZsjlOmgAyyazkZFzHrtKRyqNE5l+tMj9jNWsbUp1WZis IbhkirVP8UDhGDk7kzC3UjBHnnvCZcBAXyG2TwRcX2gG4oze9/FxoUeGTvmBEUuHm7yQ KGKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e17si4113954iot.15.2021.11.03.11.21.22; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230353AbhKCSW7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:22:59 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60744 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229558AbhKCSW4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:22:56 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1D09F68AA6; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 19:20:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 19:20:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, dan.j.williams@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, richard@nod.at, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, vigneshr@ti.com, efremov@linux.com, song@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, hare@suse.de, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ataflop: address add_disk() error handling on probe Message-ID: <20211103182016.GB7745@lst.de> References: <20211103181258.1462704-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20211103181258.1462704-3-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211103181258.1462704-3-mcgrof@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 11:12:56AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > We need to cleanup resources on the probe() callback registered > with __register_blkdev(), now that add_disk() error handling is > supported. Address this. > > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain > --- > drivers/block/ataflop.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/ataflop.c b/drivers/block/ataflop.c > index 170dd193cef6..e981b351f37e 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/ataflop.c > +++ b/drivers/block/ataflop.c > @@ -2012,6 +2012,7 @@ static void ataflop_probe(dev_t dev) > { > int drive = MINOR(dev) & 3; > int type = MINOR(dev) >> 2; > + int err = 0; > > if (type) > type--; > @@ -2019,11 +2020,20 @@ static void ataflop_probe(dev_t dev) > if (drive >= FD_MAX_UNITS || type >= NUM_DISK_MINORS) > return; > if (!unit[drive].disk[type]) { > + err = ataflop_alloc_disk(drive, type); > + if (err == 0) { > + err = add_disk(unit[drive].disk[type]); > + if (err) > + goto err_out; > + else > + unit[drive].registered[type] = true; This looks weird. Why not: if (unit[drive].disk[type]) return; if (ataflop_alloc_disk(drive, type)) return; if (add_disk(unit[drive].disk[type])) goto cleanup_disk; unit[drive].registered[type] = true; return; cleanup_disk: blk_cleanup_disk(unit[drive].disk[type]); unit[drive].disk[type] = NULL;