Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:01:11 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To:     Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] tty/sysrq: Add alternative SysRq key
Message-ID: <20211104120111.GB23122@duo.ucw.cz>
References: <20211103155438.11167-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211103155438.11167-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk


--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> There exist machines which don't have SysRq key at all, e.g. chromebooks.
>=20
> This patch allows configuring an alternative key to act as SysRq. Devices
> which declare KEY_SYSRQ in their 'keybit' bitmap continue using KEY_SYSRQ,
> but other devices use the alternative SysRq key instead, by default F10.
> Which key is actually used can be modified with sysrq's module
> parameter.

Is F10 sensible default? Would it make sense to use something like
alt-shift-esc so that this can be enabled by default?

Best regards,
								Pavel
--=20
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCYYPLhwAKCRAw5/Bqldv6
8hfFAJ9LecIqYJZx8MdhF6gtwKzhQ0qYHgCgtmj55V1Rumu9ySpwR5FVnYK4d0A=
=hgtI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--