Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211016102232.202119-1-michael@amarulasolutions.com> <YWrFIz08A8ZVKXvi@ravnborg.org>
In-Reply-To: <YWrFIz08A8ZVKXvi@ravnborg.org>
From:   Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:19:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOf5uwnv=MxqK772YJ3mggkqFQJW+Z3_WrCNHgDPTpDH8d-2Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Wanchanglong panel used in px30-evb v11
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sam

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 2:27 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:22:27AM +0000, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> > This patch series add support for W552946ABA panel. This panel is used
> > in px30-evb v11. All the patches can be applied on top of drm-fixes
> > branch. The last patch is suppose to fix a race when the panel is built
> > in. Tested on px30 evb
> >
> > Michael Trimarchi (5):
> >   dt-bindings: vendor-prefix: add Wanchanglong Electronics Technology
> >   drm/panel: ilitek-ili9881d: add support for Wanchanglong W552946ABA
> >     panel
> >   dt-bindings: ili9881c: add compatible string for Wanchanglong
> >     w552946aba
> >   drm/panel: ilitek-ili9881c: Make gpio-reset optional
> The four patches has been applied to drm-misc-next.
>

I sent another fix on the same panel. Are those patches queued on some tree?

> >   drm/bridge: dw-mipi-dsi: Fix dsi registration during drm probing
> This patch looks like it does not belong in this series.
> Anyway - commented on it as I did not understand the code.
>
>         Sam

Michael