Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp2099802pxb; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYmVI2NrpcpJ+qEOdsgINswqYKsJ1uKQlB7QNjZ738WVpONhdMQ0SfIzKiRSS1vkRYW5Ea X-Received: by 2002:a02:620b:: with SMTP id d11mr5660846jac.69.1636059922813; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636059922; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h3Tajdrg1Uthp5VXKV0SjGcPZM7hBoZvzOALrQSpR6snrfQ1KRU7U2djLRrkX4HBNj v9FQh6t7KNWhcX11jEux6YDRx6Bnd3E8Jt5Zouf29+McntTv+lF2v7Hgp6jhIzgEFDX7 jWob5ge14Sw+rNo7wNkDOaNZcCibAzBAKmhS5rStSMZ0vJ+ziOsLnm3jGMosu9MjLX54 xt4jJqzsgaLlAldxGzQHufNHJOb2aN7sYu8EDeNQP7mKlj2vC7HYpABZtQZtZ3zKEmBf wFA+7I0BHWKwXEhFOy9Saw9lvitItsz74a4qRel+gTiM/WW7+dMuo5UzLpMpAWEyCy6r hRnA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=HlUyb94lQB0YUSrmRZ31/WYJ0OQFpRSOr5iyyx2CB+I=; b=frpygZORafkGXw22eIF16Fu4NtsAfF81sE8kf/gNAGSka1ZVIB9sevTlror4WSbwrr PVE547NNqU46cZsR5fn2choPkIQRUnysiiyQPV2aGwUZGGcRQpQ3H4u/KXWcmQCzfSMm 2nROz1m0VjOgt7KB147/8tjD3PWTon8Fe/rEt7vVNhZZh+4qjbgohCiJlC/EGV8lDWzV n/5DDeCdu3tOYWM9njrBqmJNqBRUO6aedSAd0TxDlLwE2E3dYm5DrbPlMpSJ5H16CBP6 11HX88BJF659p/P3KPnjIZzT7qq0SbFF3p/VCnCKGUiq9GfqDEzu4Uyvb1hTGlCNrF1/ Vf5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iZbh4uDL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g2si12551646ile.118.2021.11.04.14.05.09; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iZbh4uDL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232245AbhKDUeA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 16:34:00 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:45646 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231484AbhKDUd7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 16:33:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636057880; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HlUyb94lQB0YUSrmRZ31/WYJ0OQFpRSOr5iyyx2CB+I=; b=iZbh4uDLSP6kT7knLw1eAIfBEVznYQ+opQcOSyUDBkZ9FShhYRFB1bBd+Eqr+iUpM6c1Nz w2g66LNA7mUQTV++sdSNdLD/FbzjJdfh4N3E3lGk5qvqQy3A8jGgCfZH+u4MSRTRE1fH9S GI9TeD/uXnHLI7OrozjVp7RjdEUAJZE= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-411-yXlCTmB8MYen1HrSYPloIA-1; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 16:31:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yXlCTmB8MYen1HrSYPloIA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id h13-20020adfa4cd000000b001883fd029e8so784905wrb.11 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 13:31:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HlUyb94lQB0YUSrmRZ31/WYJ0OQFpRSOr5iyyx2CB+I=; b=4flzg7VRmiTrR6PE1M2RubUmM6rSwRZgQRo+3N2g8xXMaBvQkX/0ZFaaMBAmYJOCY2 UnTVReJeBEU0nM18WhymW3dgoiYJBQC088UhQPZO6C+loP4VJF69wODerRXOQ5QIaUM1 To1dZZbTQzl619SlZMqaYu16wgtdZrdxUQeMZVZPOeIjAu4OLYipE/GYt/Ro0BEYFYcc uW1459VZSf4F5+YecHc3yrbmeA4f59qXyC6CXKQRcFgaHcWsJw7E31crj6XVxi4MQ7Rg kCYc4N8dCrWh3R9TF4h6AIc4HLpsmouLWw7PYZwJWcIM5C4Q4uiGAJ8okVb78NssmmtG KyOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uMUwnsfMyEkazuueswZfErTQKABj6bBpzoZLsCuUzcrTe74kq klWCEcpj0T6Ebrt2tuv3pTSQ9ZYTHFYx6v1EcvB5KJ4+x7fn+E4JLKfs1Vz1XpgMNDsYyupvWTK JXkc3EyvwH6GkdLIAuq9ETaNyrR5F0oV3+sc9zC8f X-Received: by 2002:a5d:628f:: with SMTP id k15mr55558396wru.363.1636057878508; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 13:31:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:628f:: with SMTP id k15mr55558351wru.363.1636057878260; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 13:31:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211102122945.117744-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20211102122945.117744-5-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andreas Gruenbacher Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 21:31:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/17] iov_iter: Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into fault_in_iov_iter_readable To: Catalin Marinas Cc: cluster-devel , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Paul Mackerras , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-fsdevel , LKML , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs , joey.gouly@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 7:22 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 01:29:32PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into a function that returns the number > > of bytes not faulted in, similar to copy_to_user, instead of returning a > > non-zero value when any of the requested pages couldn't be faulted in. > > This supports the existing users that require all pages to be faulted in > > as well as new users that are happy if any pages can be faulted in. > > > > Rename iov_iter_fault_in_readable to fault_in_iov_iter_readable to make > > sure this change doesn't silently break things. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher > [...] > > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c > > index ff34f4087f87..4dd5edcd39fd 100644 > > --- a/mm/filemap.c > > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > > @@ -3757,7 +3757,7 @@ ssize_t generic_perform_write(struct file *file, > > * same page as we're writing to, without it being marked > > * up-to-date. > > */ > > - if (unlikely(iov_iter_fault_in_readable(i, bytes))) { > > + if (unlikely(fault_in_iov_iter_readable(i, bytes))) { > > status = -EFAULT; > > break; > > } > > Now that fault_in_iov_iter_readable() returns the number of bytes, we > could change the above test to: > > if (unlikely(fault_in_iov_iter_readable(i, bytes) == bytes)) { > > Assuming we have a pointer 'a', accessible, and 'a + PAGE_SIZE' unmapped: > > write(fd, a + PAGE_SIZE - 1, 2); > > can still copy one byte but it returns -EFAULT instead since the second > page is not accessible. > > While writing some test-cases for MTE (sub-page faults, 16-byte > granularity), we noticed that reading 2 bytes from 'a + 15' with > 'a + 16' tagged for faulting: > > write(fd, a + 15, 2); > > succeeds as long as 'a + 16' is not at a page boundary. Checking against > 'bytes' above makes this consistent. > > The downside is that it's an ABI change though not sure anyone is > relying on it. The same pattern exists in iomap_write_iter too, of course. In the very light testing I did for eliminating the pre-faulting, this kind of change was working fine. I have no performance numbers though. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20211026094430.3669156-1-agruenba@redhat.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20211027212138.3722977-1-agruenba@redhat.com/ Thanks, Andreas