Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] iio: test: Add test for IIO_VAL_INT_64.
To:     Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com, jbhayana@google.com,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <CAHp75Vd7Wwka37w-6QTXT9vv13bPiygKryBhQTnyvtTpCNU9qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20211102073300.13376-1-andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com>
 <CAHp75VfafpEBccivDRC2AVVJbZL2Kdq2KeR0yf_nwTtDTxvDkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6d909cca-46a9-3f40-5d4d-97ef2fbe33e9@opensynergy.com>
From:   Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Message-ID: <0c449b88-a6fb-76ca-5c13-807f7728f1da@metafoo.de>
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:50:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6d909cca-46a9-3f40-5d4d-97ef2fbe33e9@opensynergy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 11/5/21 9:45 AM, Andriy Tryshnivskyy wrote:
> On 02.11.21 10:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the 
>> sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:33 AM Andriy Tryshnivskyy
>> <andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com> wrote:
>> Now it's good with format, but you have missed the commit message.
>
> Actually commit massage contains a header only (no body message), but 
> I can add body message too.
> Thanks!
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andriy Tryshnivskyy 
>>> <andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com>
>> ...
>>
>>> +static void iio_test_iio_format_value_integer_64(struct kunit *test)
>>> +{
>>> +       char *buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> Shouldn't this be checked against NULL?
>
> Good question. Truly speaking I've made new test similar to other. And 
> no other tests has a check for NULL.
>
The other tests not having it is my fault. There should be a 
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf) under the allocation.