Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:12:44 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Antonio Terceiro <antonio.terceiro@linaro.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: drop cc-option fallbacks for architecture selection
Message-ID: <20211105081244.brp34ec3covsuogt@flow>
References: <20211018140735.3714254-1-arnd@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20211018140735.3714254-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-10-18 16:07:12 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote:
…
> 
> This should be safe to apply on all stable kernels, and will be required
> in order to keep building them with gcc-11 and higher.

Could we get this applied, please?

Matthias Klose asked gcc-upstream if the change, causing the problem,
was expected/ intended. I don't think this matters given that the
provided fallback does not work.

Sebastian