Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750867AbXAEXXA (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:23:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750868AbXAEXXA (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:23:00 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:52305 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863AbXAEXW7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:22:59 -0500 Message-ID: <459EDDD1.6060208@goop.org> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:22:57 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rene Herman CC: Zachary Amsden , Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] romsignature/checksum cleanup References: <458EEDF7.4000200@gmail.com> <458F20FB.7040900@gmail.com> <1167179512.16175.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <459310A3.4060706@vmware.com> <459ABA2F.6070907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <459ABA2F.6070907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 17 Rene Herman wrote: > Jeremy? Is it okay to only check the signature word? The checksum will > generally be done over more than 1 (hw) page... That "presumably" > there seems a bit flaky? Well, in the Xen case, where the pages are simply not mapped, then the signature simply won't exist. In other cases, I guess its possible the signature might exist but the rest of the ROM doesn't, but that won't happen on normal hardware. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/