Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <ff8187bb-a9ab-11a1-f658-911c1b601ce7@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:06:04 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.1.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 14/16] Revert "wcn36xx: Disable bmps when encryption
 is disabled"
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
References: <20211104141159.561284732@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20211104141200.061783376@linuxfoundation.org> <20211105131848.GA9566@amd>
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20211105131848.GA9566@amd>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 05/11/2021 13:18, Pavel Machek wrote:
> This explains why revert is a good idea for mainline, but it may still
> cause problems for 5.10. Is someone able to test it in 5.10?
> 
> Best regards,
> 								Pavel

I have to pull in a bunch of out-of-tree patches to boot on the target 
device but..

Sure, I can have a look over the weekend

---
bod