Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:03:28 +0400
From:   Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        syzbot <syzbot+43fd005b5a1b4d10781e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, sboyd@kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rosted@goodmis.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ktime_get_coarse_ts64
Message-ID: <20211105170328.fjnzr6bnbca7mdfq@amnesia>
References: <00000000000013aebd05cff8e064@google.com>
 <87lf224uki.ffs@tglx>
 <CAADnVQLcuMAr3XMTD1Lys5S5ybME4h=NL3=adEwib2UT6b-E9w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLcuMAr3XMTD1Lys5S5ybME4h=NL3=adEwib2UT6b-E9w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 08:53:06AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 6:10 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > -> #0 (tk_core.seq.seqcount){----}-{0:0}:
> > >        check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
> > >        check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
> > >        validate_chain+0x1dfb/0x8240 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789
> > >        __lock_acquire+0x1382/0x2b00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
> > >        lock_acquire+0x19f/0x4d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625
> > >        seqcount_lockdep_reader_access+0xfe/0x230 include/linux/seqlock.h:103
> > >        ktime_get_coarse_ts64+0x25/0x110 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:2255
> > >        ktime_get_coarse include/linux/timekeeping.h:120 [inline]
> > >        ktime_get_coarse_ns include/linux/timekeeping.h:126 [inline]
> >
> > --> this call is invalid
> >
> > >        ____bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns kernel/bpf/helpers.c:173 [inline]
> > >        bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns+0x7e/0x130 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:171
> > >        bpf_prog_a99735ebafdda2f1+0x10/0xb50
> > >        bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:721 [inline]
> > >        __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:626 [inline]
> > >        bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:633 [inline]
> > >        BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY include/linux/bpf.h:1294 [inline]
> > >        trace_call_bpf+0x2cf/0x5d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:127
> > >        perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x7b/0x1d0 kernel/events/core.c:9708
> > >        perf_trace_lock+0x37c/0x440 include/trace/events/lock.h:39
> > >        trace_lock_release+0x128/0x150 include/trace/events/lock.h:58
> >
> > Timestamps from within a tracepoint can only be taken with:
> >
> >          1) jiffies
> >          2) sched_clock()
> >          3) ktime_get_*_fast_ns()
> >
> > Those are NMI safe and can be invoked from anywhere.
> >
> > All other time getters which have to use the timekeeping seqcount
> > protection are prone to live locks and _cannot_ be used from
> > tracepoints ever.
> 
> Obviously.
> That helper was added for networking use cases and accidentally
> enabled for tracing.

Sorry for that.
I'm preparing a patch that will forbid using bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns()
helper in BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT.


-- 

Dmitrii Banshchikov