Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp3918616pxb; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 03:12:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxT06/1OcYqbn7ZbUoW/5l3gH42Fw9+o5+1QLBodXICx94uAYF8dCfWjUkoM89qufdyrlUt X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9711:: with SMTP id jg17mr57910038ejc.242.1636193551371; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:12:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636193551; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wl5SqZWFT7m8UFaqjhaYRWPQgJQDErWBshZ/V/g/QkQIde38tHzCZDnDL2KEHVWxAu DPwjnXjYSr+Mfx/eZHit5w7ylLSzUavHh/EduVmAkiIVrhqS+yIcE4nkv2bWUgkgR7JZ RmtY+ioobDG+/Um/LskXFGQuFZoIyuXwlWAG1ETo+ULTxsH05IRIKCrb7c5ioDkZn3Pf 71g+3YBRVv/ZDezSOYB3ev83nsZKHjRXI9cmcK6k5yvHzVc2yPd6GTk/1acceI9JFQjo czTzDRJMcfD1SUNNv5QwPqNuLK1LdAhVVBjrC5MBxkcRZJC0OebUG1cECVH2q0t/c8EM e9yA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=dZtYE3HC/eYc7zgbZB9IjEe7G001W/xCeXsiw8SwQcg=; b=k5Bn8Mdk5/7cSZ/GOzTjyC5Zi1sLM5G3nbVFRHSGUwK4v2oHYos0/2uJ0CXF1O2tnG 30VEdBtzS0GuEgyKUHyInq+LiwDHOaonSKA4qQhlVFLOkDp+rbAAc6rP+1E+bcB9iisZ vWeUBHrhgo1iE7rJrlEhNtIDoed9vSd3e8L5T5wTCuUDhqqGgHj2AYEuaaRA6gfumMO1 uF/pC/my/7XDdHDToU0SiC64f8F1AMTjpoyMYuO25dJ0qcWjjzMHmC4EOa/o/b36GGnl 9ychrvojxpigxIoMqmuSZT3bkZynst1sscdkbR67kcjfEiWS0LjRPIe3AgayYPBej7pn BSAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ezmw88IE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ds9si8637297ejc.479.2021.11.06.03.12.07; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 03:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ezmw88IE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232860AbhKFCxa (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 22:53:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51460 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232660AbhKFCx3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 22:53:29 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207C7C061570; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 19:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g125so17513497oif.9; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 19:50:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dZtYE3HC/eYc7zgbZB9IjEe7G001W/xCeXsiw8SwQcg=; b=ezmw88IEXL+cmCKKYXGRzYlA9Z6Ceea3oTnejVH3MOZubcgyBH3Lsw9dXjCBZjCxs+ iDm5LF7u43bbvuwRidGOSlLISIiKgUGD4MdvNooHxd/AqlDYvaf3ukX3tDafT/rbW6Dz sFMBi5ozG1ISHJvHSs9oFag4y268QfrNJENWM4R0JFkqRqq22U7hZ6haDSyo3m4fkGK7 +k2UgRoexPeIeOFhNMcLtuXrp38VUsQfjuh/imOilc2UbnX13Cg2up4gWScrzdsSnPfQ NXOKijNc9uH/ene9/Rx8NNV+tYeNNT35GTFXKPo8DhffBz+nGUDnt9NivhvDW6RUAem9 hjCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dZtYE3HC/eYc7zgbZB9IjEe7G001W/xCeXsiw8SwQcg=; b=w4xePMKpGLAJYQ5otpUg8uVMbV0kv59ss1BihrQMV5wAmodI6+VqGz85s9v1ky3iMf Qi6TaTgyU3M1kobk+u9MpzHg36w0nEANYScHqcGeAH44qcGVB3XBxj7gCB287asbbGJy rfesFKDVEhXl5o0B0zrqK3ioQ+cGUw6VFkxwOnkV3wxLMrV/ItFz/8B4BVh0PobZjGOo BZ4veIM/FVD8Ms4Cu/BiVLNrl3ielrLr3RmfyUJS3ioCKxuo4gGCwIsknGCiijXC8w5n zG5IBLgf3BLYT3AEKuF8aM0fZvlRjMLZvYM42a1bp1YQdNJmj6itc2TNZQZm6rRIOZ/3 F4Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323SdVLHWp+fDVV6T/e8Uxte1EJIq8ONzNCxs6qfU6XjOz/ysUC F0nM8sBwP5myfoCdd4v+zXg= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4e97:: with SMTP id c23mr24848590oiy.153.1636167048433; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:dfe0:49f0:a892:6224:ce6d:2f10? ([2600:1700:dfe0:49f0:a892:6224:ce6d:2f10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d13sm3112786otc.2.2021.11.05.19.50.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Nov 2021 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f4e28f9-8d1e-f2e9-aa0c-37b2c4cd8e8a@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 19:50:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] net: dsa: b53: Add logic for TX timestamping Content-Language: en-US To: Martin Kaistra , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot Cc: Richard Cochran , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Boyd , Russell King , Marc Kleine-Budde , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20211104133204.19757-1-martin.kaistra@linutronix.de> <20211104133204.19757-7-martin.kaistra@linutronix.de> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20211104133204.19757-7-martin.kaistra@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/4/2021 6:32 AM, Martin Kaistra wrote: > In order to get the switch to generate a timestamp for a transmitted > packet, we need to set the TS bit in the BRCM tag. The switch will then > create a status frame, which gets send back to the cpu. > In b53_port_txtstamp() we put the skb into a waiting position. > > When a status frame is received, we extract the timestamp and put the time > according to our timecounter into the waiting skb. When > TX_TSTAMP_TIMEOUT is reached and we have no means to correctly get back > a full timestamp, we cancel the process. > > As the status frame doesn't contain a reference to the original packet, > only one packet with timestamp request can be sent at a time. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaistra > --- [snip] > +static long b53_hwtstamp_work(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp) > +{ > + struct b53_device *dev = > + container_of(ptp, struct b53_device, ptp_clock_info); > + struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) { > + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps; > + > + if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, i)) > + continue; Can you also check on !dsa_port_is_unused()? [snip] > #endif > diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c b/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c > index 85dc47c22008..53cd0345df1b 100644 > --- a/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c > +++ b/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -85,9 +86,14 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, > unsigned int offset) > { > struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev); > + struct b53_device *b53_dev = dp->ds->priv; > + unsigned int type = ptp_classify_raw(skb); > u16 queue = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb); > + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps; > u8 *brcm_tag; > > + ps = &b53_dev->ports[dp->index].port_hwtstamp; The dsa_port structure as a priv member which would be well suited to store &b53_dev->ports[dp->index].port_hwtstamp and avoid traversing multiple layers of objects here. You don't need to need b53_device at all, and even if you did, you could easily add a back pointer to it in port_hwstamp. This applies below as well in brcm_tag_rcv_ll [snip] > + > /* Frames with this tag have one of these two layouts: > * ----------------------------------- > * | MAC DA | MAC SA | 4b tag | Type | DSA_TAG_PROTO_BRCM > @@ -143,6 +181,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_rcv_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, > unsigned int offset, > int *tag_len) > { > + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps; > + struct b53_device *b53_dev; > + struct dsa_port *dp; > int source_port; > u8 *brcm_tag; > u32 tstamp; > @@ -174,6 +215,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_rcv_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, > if (!skb->dev) > return NULL; > > + /* Check whether this is a status frame */ > + if (*tag_len == 8 && brcm_tag[3] & 0x20) { Can we have an unlikely() here, because this is unlikely to happen except for switches that do support PTP, and we only have 53128 so far. Also a define for this 0x20 would be nice, it is the timestamp bit for the packet. -- Florian