Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:35:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:35:40 -0500 Received: from [213.37.2.159] ([213.37.2.159]:2749 "EHLO alcorcon.madritel.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:35:34 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: LOBOS Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 01:04:55 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ra=FAl?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FA=F1ez?= de Arenas Coronado Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ra=FAl?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FA=F1ez?= de Arenas Coronado X-Mailer: DervishD TWiSTiNG Mailer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all :)) I've reading a bit about booting Linux within Linux, and I'm pretty interested in this issue. The point here is, will a stable kernel support this in a near future?. There are a few alternatives like 'LOBOS' (which, IMHO, is the most portable, easy and small of all), 'bootimg', the two kernel monte, etc... This will be very useful for a lot of thinks: netbooting, initrd replacement, kernel switching and testing, etc... Have you think about adding this to the kernel. It won't enlarge the kernel and IMHO is a very good thing to have. Of course I'm not a kernel guru and I don't know what kind of problems this would arise. Have fun :) Ra?l - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/