Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751433AbXAFSV6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:21:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751448AbXAFSV6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:21:58 -0500 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:10647 "EHLO pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751433AbXAFSV5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:21:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:21:50 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: libata error handling In-reply-to: To: Kasper Sandberg Cc: LKML Mailinglist , jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Message-id: <459FE8BE.7070208@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 20 Kasper Sandberg wrote: > i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what > made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very > true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get > extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects > errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i > perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe. Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg.. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/