Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:09:04 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 16/42] USB: Check notifier registration return value
Message-ID: <YYkvgFW07CPRrBPn@zn.tnic>
References: <20211108101157.15189-1-bp@alien8.de>
 <20211108101157.15189-17-bp@alien8.de>
 <20211108140553.GA1666297@rowland.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211108140553.GA1666297@rowland.harvard.edu>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:05:53AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> This is a rather misleading description.  The patch does exactly the 
> opposite: It _adds_ a homegrown notifier registration check.  (Homegrown 
> in the sense that the check is made by the individual caller rather than 
> being centralized in the routine being called.)

See the 0th message - there is a link to another example of what I mean
with "homegrown" but I see your point.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette